Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$96k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
20
Grants FY2025
23
Organizations funded FY2024
70%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$3,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$17,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 23
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$1.7M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 70% of the organizations Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 50% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsCivil RightsPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving19$94k47%
FY202423$73k70%
FY202315$51k67%
FY20228$25kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$77kHousing & Shelter$56kRecreation & Sports$36kReligion$25kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$8kPhilanthropy$6kCrime & Legal$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Loreto House$34,50041%
Our Daily Bread Inc$28,25040%
Mary Elizabeth Maternity Home Inc$15,40025%
Hearts for Homes$12,50031%
The Stanford Charitable Corporation$12,50025%
North Texas State Fair Association Inc$12,0001n/a
Hands to Hands Community Fund$7,50021%
Abba Women's Center Inc$7,50031%
North Central Texas College Foundation$5,50020%
Sacred Heart Catholic Parish$5,0001n/a
Show all 32 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($51k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLoreto House: $34,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetOur Daily Bread Inc: $28,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMary Elizabeth Maternity Home Inc: $15,400 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetHearts for Homes: $12,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetThe Stanford Charitable Corporation: $12,500 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetHands to Hands Community Fund: $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAbba Women's Center Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNorth Central Texas College Foundation: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMuenster Texas Jaycees Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHungry Hearts Feeding Ministry: $4,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetThe Pines Education Group dba The Pines Catholic Camp: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Denton County Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Sky Therapeutic Riding and Respite: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMuenster Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDenton Benefit League: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of North Texas Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTrust Point Foundation Inc Xxxxxx2342: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of the Muenster Public Library: $2,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetThe Tipton Home: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLovepacs: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCumberland Youth and Family Services: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSeventeen22 Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Way of Denton County Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX25.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Dugas Family Foundation Tx Inc · The Henry Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc · United Way of Denton County Inc · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation

How much does Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation give?
Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation reported 20 grants totaling $96,400 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 23 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (31%), Housing & Shelter (23%), Recreation & Sports (15%).
Who are Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Loreto House ($35k), Our Daily Bread Inc ($28k), Mary Elizabeth Maternity Home Inc ($15k).
Does Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 70% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Communities Foundation of Texas Inc, Coserv Charitable Foundation, Texas Instruments Foundation.
Where is Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation based?
Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clyde and Pauline Fisher’s filings →

More from the funding graph