Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc

We provide service to others, promote integrity, and advance world understanding, goodwill, and peace through our fellowship of business, professional, and community leaders.

$205k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

International$172kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$32kYouth Development$29kEducation$28kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kFood & Nutrition$20kHuman Services$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $118,128 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $205,041 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,913 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$7,258
Median grant
3
States reached
$65k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Cross Timbers Rotary Club DAF$51,920
PediPlace$13,424
Christian Community Action$11,075
Journey to Dream$10,010
Span Meals on Wheels$7,258
Winning the Fight$6,504
Lovepacs$6,403
Disaster Aid USA$6,294
Rotary International Foundation$5,240
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Lovepacs: $6k → 8%Disaster Aid USA: $6k → 11%Span Meals on Wheels: $7k → 8%Span Meals on Wheels: $6k → 8%Journey to Dream: $12k → 8%Journey to Dream: $10k → 8%Journey to Dream: $7k → 8%Cloud 9 Charities: $6k → 8%Cloud 9 Charities: $6k → 8%Cross Timbers Family YMCA: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 52% of Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$74k · 4 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$74k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+4%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k · revenue +13%
  • WT
    WTF-WINNING THE FIGHT
    3× · 2022–2024 · $19k · revenue -22%
  • SI
    SPAN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $13k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • OD
    OUR DAILY BREAD INC
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +8%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS
    one grant, 2022 · $17k
  • Lewisville Education Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

2
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

3
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Collin County Inc

To provide trained community volunteers to advocate the best interests of abused or neglected children in cps custody from collin county.

Civil Rights
4
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
5
Crisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center

To provide emergency assistance to people in Montgomery County, TX who are in an unexpected crisis.

Human Services
6
Casa Child Advocates of Montgomery County Inc

Child Advocates of Montgomery County empowers vulnerable children through volunteer advocacy and strengthens their family and community with education, so they can flourish in a safe, nurturing environment.

Civil Rights
7
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
8
The Dallas County System of Services Inc

To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.

Human Services
9
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
10
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

11
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
12
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Advocacy Center for North Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Wtf-Winning the Fight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
11/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $187,269 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION — $29,474 · Human ServicesTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM F…SPAN INC — $13,257 · Human ServicesSPAN INCCLOUD NINE CHARITIES INC — $12,079 · Human ServicesCLOUD NINE CHARITIES I…Lovepacs — $6,403 · Human ServicesLovepacsDISASTER AID USA INC — $6,294 · Human ServicesDISASTER AID USA INCYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $5,136 · Human ServicesYMCA OF METROPOLITAN D…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS — $17,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…PEDIPLACE INC — $13,424 · OtherPEDIPLACE IN…CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $5,205 · OtherCHILDRENS AD…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF DENTON COUNTY INC — $5,089 · OtherCOURT APPOIN…OUR DAILY BREAD INC — $23,941 · Food & NutritionWTF-WINNING THE FIGHT — $18,918 · HealthCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $11,075 · Housing & ShelterLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $11,000 · Education
International$187,269Human Services$72,643Other$40,718Food & Nutrition$23,941Health$18,918Housing & Shelter$11,075Education$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $187,269 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOURNEY TO DREAM FOUNDATION — $29,474 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD INC — $23,941 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWTF-WINNING THE FIGHT — $18,918 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC — $13,424 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPAN INC — $13,257 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLOUD NINE CHARITIES INC — $12,079 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY ACTION — $11,075 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLewisville Education Foundation Inc — $11,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLovepacs — $6,403 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDISASTER AID USA INC — $6,294 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $5,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $5,136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF DENTON COUNTY INC — $5,089 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coserv Charitable FoundationTX19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coserv Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Davidson Foundation Inc · United Way of Denton County Inc · Clyde and Pauline Fisher Foundation · The Henry Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Cross Timbers Rotary Club Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph