Skip to content
Club Culturale Italiano Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Club Culturale Italiano Inc

To promote italian culture, heritage & traditions.

$154k
Granted FY2021
22
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2021 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $145,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $153,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k20 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$4,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$81k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RSEARCH HOSPITAL$10,000
CASA ANGELICA FOUNDATION$9,500
NEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$4,000
STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES$4,000
GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$4,000
JONI & FRIENDS$4,000
PB&J FAMILY SERVICES$4,000
ALBUQUERQUE MEALS ON WHEELS$4,000
NMCAN$4,000
ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$4,000
FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES$4,000
NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC$4,000
ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NM$4,000
OPERA SOUTHWEST$4,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS: $4k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES IN THE ARCHIDOCESE OF SANTA FE: $4k → 14%FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $4k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $4k → 14%ALL FAITHS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
2
Cplc New Mexico Inc

Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…

Community Improvement
3
Albuquerque Health Care for the Homeless Inc

To provide caring and comprehensive health and supporting services, linking people experiencing homelessness to individual/collective solutions and to be a leader in creating service delivery models and solutions to homelessness.

Human Services
4
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
5
New Mexico Kids Matter Inc

New mexico kids matter inc., serves as a court appointed special advocate to advocate for the best interest of abused, neglected and high-risk children.

Crime & Legal
6
La Familia Medical Center

Our mission is to foster community well-being in partnership with our patients by providing excellent, accessible, family-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care. our vision is "healthy lives for all in a healthy santa fe"…

—
7
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
8
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
9
Children's Cancer Fund of New Mexico

The children's cancer fund of new mexico exists to help persons from new mexico who have been diagnosed with and treated for childhood cancer (at a new mexico pediatric oncology facility) and their families cope with the day-to-day…

—
10
New Mexico Aids Services Inc

New mexico aids services, inc provides housing, education and nutritional support to the public in response to the aids crisis.

Human Services
11
National Alliance on Mental Illness New Mexico

The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for New Mexicans who suffer from mental illness.

—
12
New Mexico Association for Home and

The organization serves its membership through advocacy, networking, education, and communication by promoting success and best practices for home care, hospice, and related home health support services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks; the most unlike its peers is Casa Angelica Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER FOUNDATIONUNICA: $4,000 · Human ServicesUNICASTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION: $4,000 · Human ServicesSTEELBRIDGE MINIST…CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $4,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIESALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesALBUQUERQUE CHRIST…FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $4,000 · Human ServicesFATHERS BUILDING F…EL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesEL RANCHITO DE LOS…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDR…CANCER SERVICES OF NEW MEXICO: $4,000 · HealthCANCER SERVICE…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO: $4,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONAL…Casa Angelica Foundation: $9,500 · ReligionJONI AND FRIENDS: $4,000 · OtherJONI AND FRIENDSNEW MEXICO CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKS: $4,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO CHILD A…ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 · OtherROADRUNNER FOOD BA…Meals on Wheels New Mexico: $4,000 · OtherMeals on Wheels Ne…GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 · OtherGREATER ALBUQUERQU…PB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4,000 · OtherPB&J FAMILY SERVIC…Opera Southwest: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePAWS AND STRIPES INC: $4,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $4,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$54,000Human Services$24,000Health$18,000Religion$9,500Other$24,000Arts & Culture$8,000Animals$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa Angelica Foundation: $9,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetJONI AND FRIENDS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOpera Southwest: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORKS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNICA: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES FKA ALBUQUERQUE RESCUE MISSION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SERVICES OF NEW MEXICO: $4,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels New Mexico: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW MEXICO CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALBUQUERQUE CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFATHERS BUILDING FUTURES: $4,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPB&J FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL RANCHITO DE LOS NINOS INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Pnm Tnmp FoundationCarl C Anderson Sr an…Nusenda FoundationKing-Carpenter Founda…Santa Fe Community Fo…Francis C Elkin & Phy…Campaigning for Chari…Arnia FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Enterprise Holdings F…Banner Foundation
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM34.1× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · King-Carpenter Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Francis C Elkin & Phyllis J Frier Foundation · Campaigning for Charities · Arnia Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Banner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Club Culturale Italiano Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Club Culturale Italiano Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Club Culturale Italiano’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home