Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2019
17
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$600
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of The Ozarks Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
’17
0
’18
6
’19
0
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$178kHealth$8kArts & Culture$5kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kReligion$500Environment$500Other$0
02FY2019 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROMUSICA$600
CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRY COUNTY INC$600
JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND$550
WILDCAT GLADES FRIENDS GROUP$500
REGIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE ASSOC$500
LIFECHOICES$500
CONNECT2CULTURE$400
Individual grant recipient$400
JOPLIN FAMILY Y$400
COMMUNITY CLINIC$400
SALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN$400
MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN$400
JOPLIN NALA$340
ALLIANCE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI$300
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHERN MO$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%LAFAYETTE HOUSE: $650 → 15%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS: $178k → 15%CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRY COUNTY INC: $600 → 18%JOPLIN FAMILY Y: $600 → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF SOUTHERN MO: $300 → 15%CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRY COUNTY INC: $500 → 18%POST ART LIBRARY: $500 → 15%CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $500 → 18%WILDCAT GLADES FRIENDS GROUP: $500 → 15%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF JOPLIN: $650 → 18%JOPLIN FAMILY Y: $400 → 15%JOPLIN ASSOC FOR THE BLIND: $600 → 18%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $400 → 15%PROMUSICA: $600 → 18%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $400 → 15%HOME MEDICAL EQUIP SERVICES: $600 → 18%MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION OF JOPLIN: $400 → 15%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $550 → 18%WILDCAT GLADES CONSERVATION & AUDUBON: $400 → 15%CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SW MISSOURI: $500 → 18%CHILDREN'S HAVEN: $500 → 18%CIRCLES JOPLIN: $500 → 18%LIFECHOICES: $500 → 18%JOPLIN WORKSHOPS INC: $500 → 18%CROSSLINES CHURCHES OF JOPLIN AREA: $500 → 18%CIRCLES JOPLIN: $500 → 18%CONNECT2CULTURE: $500 → 18%JOPLIN NALA READ: $500 → 18%JOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $500 → 18%JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 18%COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF JOPLIN: $500 → 18%CONNECT2CULTURE: $500 → 18%ART FEEDS JOPLIN: $400 → 18%CIRCLES JOPLIN: $400 → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS - JOPLIN OFFICE: $400 → 18%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $400 → 18%SALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN: $400 → 18%PRO MUSICA: $400 → 18%SALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN: $400 → 18%CONNECT2CULTURE: $400 → 18%ALLIANCE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $400 → 18%PRO MUSICA: $400 → 18%COMMUNITY CLINIC: $400 → 18%JOPLIN NALA: $340 → 18%ALLIANCE OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $300 → 18%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $200 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11k · 12 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
22

Total granted

$11k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+0%

Still filing today

25%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Recreation & SportsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +59%
  • PM
    PRO MUSICA
    2× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN
    2× · 2017–2019 · $700 · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • LH
    LAFAYETTE HOUSE
    one grant, 2018 · $650
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC OF JOPLIN
    one grant, 2018 · $650
  • JA
    JOPLIN ASSOC FOR THE BLIND
    one grant, 2018 · $600
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Joplin Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the economic prosperity and quality of life in the joplin region, and to be the principal advocate for, and provider of services to its business community

—
2
Crosslines Churches of the Joplin Area

The organization provides emergency services that improve the overall health and welfare of very low and low income individuals and families in the joplin, carl junction, and webb city areas.

Human Services
3
Boys & Girls Club of Joplin

The boys and girls club of southwest missouri seeks to identify and address gaps in services to children and families in southwest missouri. programming includes child and teen safety, substance

Youth Development
4
Jefferson Community Counseling Cent Dba Discovery Behavioral Healthcare

Discovery behavioral healthcare is a community based health treatment center dedicated to providing state of the art services to foster recovery and resilience in an accessible, respective and caring environment.

Youth Development
5
Mental Health Assoc in Jefferson County Inc

The mental health association is committed to individual service in a community based setting that promotes recovery, dignity, personal growth, self determination and health.

—
6
Jamhi Health & Wellness Inc

We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…

Health
7
Mercy Health Southwest Missourikansas Communities

As the sisters of mercy before us, we bring to life the healing ministry of jesus through our compassionate care and exceptional service.

—
8
Sts Joachim and Ann Care Service

To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…

—
9
Community Services League of Jackson County

To assist communities in reaching their potential by providing immediate relief to people in need assessing their situations and providing solutions that lead to economic stability.

Human Services
10
Mental Health Center of East Central Kansas

To provide dynamic, culturally-sensitive, high quality behavioral healthcare to residents of chase, coffey, greenwood, lyon, morris, osage and wabaunsee counties in the most effective, caring and efficient manner.

Health
11
Community Services Inc of Northwest Missouri

Community services, incorporated's mission is to empower the people of need in northwest missouri to achieve their goals and improve their quality of life.

—
12
Crisis Center of the Plains

To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Health Foundation Joplin; the most unlike its peers is Wildcat Glades Nature Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $178,209 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,400 · OtherIndividual …CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRY COUNTY INC: $1,100 · OtherJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $1,050 · OtherPRO MUSICA: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $1,000 · OtherREGIONAL HEALTH & WELFARE ASSOC: $900 · OtherCONNECT2CULTURE: $900 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $800 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF JOPLIN: $800 · Other+24 more: $11,040 · Other+24 moreSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN: $700 · Recreation & SportsConnect2Culture: $500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $500 · Youth DevelopmentWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP: $500 · EnvironmentJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $500 · Human ServicesLIFECHOICES: $500 · Health
Philanthropy$178,209Other$20,990Recreation & Sports$700Arts & Culture$500Youth Development$500Environment$500Human Services$500Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC: $178,209 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $1,050 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPRO MUSICA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetConnect2Culture: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOPLIN FAMILY Y: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFECHOICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE: $400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetART FEEDS JOPLIN: $400 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds PRO MUSICA ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST MISSOURI COMMUNITY ALLIAN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Connect2Culture ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HAVEN OF SOUTHWEST MISSO ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY I ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY OF TRI COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds WILDCAT GLADES NATURE GROUP ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN FAMILY Y ↗
  • Who funds LIFECHOICES ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SELF HELP CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ART FEEDS JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION JOPLIN ↗
  • Who funds JOPLIN NALA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable TrustWI32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jean Jack and Mildred Lemons Charitable Trust · Fredrick G and Rebekah B Hughes Charitable · W R Corley Memorial Trust CO SMB Trust Services · Freeman R Johnson Trust · Cragin Joy Spiva Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The United Way of Southwest Missouri · Arvest Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Carthage Area United Way · Jasper County Association for Social Ser · Ir Tua KD&ML Steadley Charitable

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Cloyd a Carlin Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cloyd a Carlin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph