Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clannad Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$176k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$281kEducation$189kFood & Nutrition$137kHealth$84kHousing & Shelter$80kCrime & Legal$69kInternational$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $141k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$3,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$864k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY (JAPANESE GARDEN)$25,000
LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK$10,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$6,000
CRANBROOK ACADEMY OF ART$5,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL-EASTERN NC$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF WILMINGTON$5,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$5,000
INSTITUTE OF GERONTOLOGY AT WAYNE$5,000
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER OF WILMINGTON$5,000
HORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND CRANBROOK$5,000
CRANBROOK CENTER FOR COLLECTION & RESEARCH$5,000
LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES$5,000
PISGAH LELGAL SERVICES$5,000
CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $11k → 21%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $3k → 21%LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $5k → 8%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $3k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $3k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $3k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $3k → 21%FOCUS HOPE: $3k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IA
CA
MD
NC
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$960k · 45 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 41 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
5

Total granted

$960k
$38k

Still filing today

49%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +2%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +39%
  • PL
    PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • WU
    WRIGHTSVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k
  • GM
    GLOBAL MINISTRIESUMCOR
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Common Ground

With the mission of "helping people move from crisis to hope," common ground is dedicated to helping youths, adults and families by providing programs and services in three distinct impact areas: responding to crisis; providing safety and…

Health
2
Michigan Advocacy Program

To advance the safety, independence, and economic stability of those most affected by poverty, racism, and other structurally oppressive systems by increasing access to justice and working for systemic solutions.

Crime & Legal
3
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
4
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
5
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
6
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Freedom House Detroit

Freedom House Detroit's mission is to "Support and empower refugees, asylum seekers, and others seeking humanitarian protection on their journey to safety, security, and freedom by providing comprehensive services in an inclusive and…

Human Services
8
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
9
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
10
South Oakland Shelter

Lighthouse mi endeavors to build equitable communities and alleviate poverty in partnership with and in service to individuals, families, and organizations.

Housing & Shelter
11
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
12
Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time, to create a future where everyone has access to nourishing food.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lighthouse of Oakland County; the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY OF WILMINGTON: $58,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF WILMINGTONFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL-EASTERN NC: $43,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL-EASTERN NCCROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN: $37,500 · OtherCROSSROADS OF MICHIGANCRANBROOK ACADEMY OF ART: $36,500 · OtherCRANBROOK ACADEMY OF ARTDOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER OF WILMINGTON: $33,000 · OtherHORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND CRANBROOK: $30,000 · OtherWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY (JAPANESE GARDEN): $25,000 · OtherST DOMINIC OUTREACH CENTER: $24,000 · OtherFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWER CAPE FEAR: $24,000 · Other+31 more: $280,000 · Other+31 moreLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $30,000 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OF…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $26,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUS…FOCUSHOPE: $18,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSHOPELITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY UPPER MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $17,500 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHE…PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $36,500 · Crime & LegalHAVEN INC: $32,000 · Crime & LegalGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterCOTS: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,000 · InternationalHumanity Now: $2,000 · InternationalFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $49,000 · Food & NutritionCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $30,000 · EducationThe Hill School of Wilmington Inc: $14,000 · Education
Other$646,000Human Services$121,500Crime & Legal$68,500Housing & Shelter$65,000International$50,000Food & Nutrition$49,000Education$44,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $49,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN: $37,500 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $36,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $35,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHAVEN INC: $32,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOTS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY: $30,000 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN: $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWER CAPE FEAR: $24,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY UPPER MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $17,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMARINERS INN: $17,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetLiving Arts: $15,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetThe Hill School of Wilmington Inc: $14,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMICHIGAN HISTORIC PRESERVATION NETWORK: $12,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENING OF DETROIT: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumanity Now: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Good Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds COTS ↗
  • Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWER CAPE FEAR ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY UPPER MICHIGAN CHAPTER ↗
  • Who funds MARINERS INN ↗
  • Who funds Living Arts ↗
  • Who funds The Hill School of Wilmington Inc ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HISTORIC PRESERVATION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Tuktawa Foundation · Detroit Industrial School · McGregor Fund · The Landfall Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clannad Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clannad Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clannad Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clannad Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clannad’s filings →

    More from the funding graph