How much did CLANNAD FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 75% of CLANNAD FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

2025

medical

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k42 grants · $131k
$10k–50k2 grants · $25k

$3,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$15,000
WRIGHTSVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
FORGOTTEN HARVEST$6,000
CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN$5,000
LIGHHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY$5,000
CRANBROOK ACADEMY OF ART$5,000
CRANBROOK CENTER FOR COLLECTION & RESEARCH$5,000
WAYNE STATE IOG$5,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER$5,000
PISGAH LELGAL SERVICES$5,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL-EASTERN NC$5,000
HORIZONS-UPWARD BOUND CRANBROOK$5,000
COTS$5,000
GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF WILMINGTON$5,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$831k · 45 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$831k

$28k

Still filing today

31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FORGOTTEN HARVEST
5× · 2020–2024 · $43k · revenue +32%
GS
GOOD SHEPHERD MINISTRIES
5× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +21%
H
HAVEN
5× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +23%

Funded once

GM
GLOBAL MINISTRIESUMCOR
one grant, 2022 · $10k
UT
UMCOR- Tennessee Tornados
one grant, 2020 · $10k
CH
CRANBROOK HOUSE AND GARDENS
one grant, 2021 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Habitat for Humanity of Michigan

To work with the economically disadvantaged to help them to create better places to live/work.

Housing & Shelter

Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals

Land Conservancy of West Michigan

The Land Conservancy of West Michigan exists to help people protect, enjoy and care for natural land in West Michigan.

Environment

Michigan Coalition to End Domestic and

To develop and promote efforts for the elimination of domestic and sexual violence.

—

Community & Home Supports Inc

We're a social service organization located in the city of detroit, michigan that specializes in providing coordinated assessment, permanent housing, and supportive services for individuals and families that are homeless.

Human Services

Greater Lansing Food Bank

Partner to alleviate hunger one meal at a time.

Food & Nutrition

United Way of South Central Michigan

United way of south central michigan strives for caring, connected, equitable communities.

Philanthropy

Lincoln Behavioral Services

Lincoln Behavioral Services provides comprehensive outpatient mental health and physical health services to individuals residing in southeastern Michigan.

Health

Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—

Michigan Pharmacists Association

To represent the pharmacy profession for advancing public health and patient care in mi.

—

United Community Housing Coalition

To provide comprehensive housing assistance to low-income residents primarily in detroit, michigan.

Housing & Shelter

Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covenant House Michigan and the most unlike its peers is The Hill School of Wilmington Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

14/14

Grantees still filing

8/14

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$671,500Housing & Shelter$55,000Food & Nutrition$43,000Human Services$43,000Crime & Legal$28,000Health$15,000Arts & Culture$12,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for SoutheastMI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Dte Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Young Woman's Home Association Of · Detroit Industrial School · McGregor Fund · Mgm Resorts Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CLANNAD FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 382539852 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CROSSROADS OF MICHIGAN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Clannad Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Clannad Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CLANNAD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Clannad Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CLANNAD FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Clannad Foundation?

More from the funding graph