Skip to content
Clackamas Women's Services at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Clackamas Women's Services

Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$632k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Youth Development$1.9MHousing & Shelter$1.7MHealth$1.3MHuman Services$918kCrime & Legal$811kPublic Benefit$216kRecreation & Sports$130kCivil Rights$83k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $2,346,974, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,548,432 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $3,201,458 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $648k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$127,651
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$631,804
ANTFARM$532,159
NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES$463,358
IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$190,125
Individual grant recipient$178,173
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON$127,651
SAFETY COMPASS$84,195
LOVEONE$67,522
CAMP ARRAH WANNA$29,737
A VILLAGE FOR ONE$19,774
BLOOMIN' BOUTIQUE$11,976
CHILDREN'S CENTER$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $453k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $75k → 12%SAFETY COMPASS: $84k → 14%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $8k → 12%SAFETY COMPASS: $48k → 14%SAFETY COMPASS: $19k → 14%SAFETY COMPASS: $19k → 14%SAFETY COMPASS: $11k → 14%BLOOMIN' BOUTIQUE: $110k → 8%LOVEONE: $68k → 8%BLOOMIN' BOUTIQUE: $12k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 14 repeat orgs$555k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$6.6M
$487k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +12%
  • THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $448k · revenue +23%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON
    3× · 2023–2025 · $304k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES
    one grant, 2024 · $321k · revenue 0%
  • CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • Todos Juntos Incgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $49k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
2
Oregon Crime Victims Law Center

Advocate for victims of crime within the criminal justice system and protective order cases; provide referrals to social-service agencies that can help crime victims recover. the center's services are available statewide at no cost to…

Crime & Legal
3
Oregon Child Abuse Solutions

To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.

Crime & Legal
4
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services
5
Child Advocacy Center of Coos County

To protect children, support families, and bring hope and healing through compassionate, coordinated, and child-centered advocacy, through specialized programs and services, such as multi-disciplinary team coordination, forensic…

Crime & Legal
6
Clackamas Women's Services

Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.

Human Services
7
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
8
Beyond These Walls

Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
9
A Family for Every Child

A family for every child (affec) is dedicated to finding permanent and loving adoptive families for waiting foster children. to accomplish our mission, we focus on finding loving and permanent families for children who the foster care…

Human Services
10
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal
11
Children's Advocacy Center of Lincoln County

Caclc offers child abuse intervention services in a safe, neutral and supportive environment for children who are suspected of being abused or neglected. caclc works with law enforcement and child welfare agencies to support child abuse…

Civil Rights
12
Casa of Lincoln & Tillamook Counties Inc

To assure a safe, permanent, nurturing home for every abused and/or neglected child by providing highly-trained volunteers to advocate for them in the court system. casa serves children in lincoln and tillamook counties in the central…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safety Compass; the most unlike its peers is Camp Arrah Wanna Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANTFARM INC: $1,735,371 · OtherANTFARM INCNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $1,304,995 · OtherNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $1,034,967 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $448,002 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONIndividual grant recipient: $379,785 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAMILY SKILLBUILDERS: $369,084 · OtherFAMILY SKILLBUILDERSCLACKAMAS COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS: $215,735 · Other+1 more: $17,765 · OtherLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON: $303,628 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID…Childrens Center: $121,000 · Crime & LegalChildrens…CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $100,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF C…Todos Juntos Inc: $48,920 · Crime & LegalTodos Jun…SAFETY COMPASS: $180,509 · Human ServicesBLOOMIN BOUTIQUE: $122,049 · Human ServicesEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $83,088 · Human ServicesLoveone: $67,522 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $320,607 · Housing & ShelterA VILLAGE FOR ONE: $162,720 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP ARRAH WANNA INC: $129,737 · Religion
Other$5,505,704Crime & Legal$573,548Human Services$453,168Housing & Shelter$320,607Youth Development$162,720Religion$129,737

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANTFARM INC: $1,735,371 over 2y, 22% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES: $1,304,995 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION: $448,002 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $320,607 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON: $303,628 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAFETY COMPASS: $180,509 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetA VILLAGE FOR ONE: $162,720 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCAMP ARRAH WANNA INC: $129,737 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetBLOOMIN BOUTIQUE: $122,049 over 2y, 23% of budgetChildrens Center: $121,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $83,088 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLoveone: $67,522 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTodos Juntos Inc: $48,920 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…The Collins FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Workforce Investment …United Way of the Col…Meyer Memorial TrustKaiser Foundation Hos…Providence Health & S…Careoregon IncJuan Young TrustThe Robert D and Marc…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR32.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Meyer Memorial Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Juan Young Trust · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clackamas Women's Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clackamas Women's Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Todos Juntos Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services: 35% of income from government
  • A Village for One: 33% of income from government
  • Antfarm Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Safety Compass: 25% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico: 13% of income from government
  • Loveone: 12% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oregon: 10% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization: 4% of income from government
  • Northwest Housing Alternatives: 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County: 0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clackamas Women's Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home