Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County

Clackamas workforce partnership serves youth, adult, and dislocated workers through its partnerships with private industry and workforce development providers.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 94% of WORKFORCE INVESTMENT COUNCIL OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $189k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $335k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
$31,631
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$1,172,018
IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY$758,734
CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE$495,678
ANTFARM YOUTH SERVICES$95,000
YOUTH MUSIC PROGRAM$80,000
LAKEWOOD CENTER FOR THE ARTS$80,000
NORTH CLACKAMAS EDUCATION FOUNDATIO$80,000
NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES$48,524
TODOS JUNTOS INC$31,631
CLACKAMAS COUNTY CHILDREN FAMILY$16,949
CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$15,000
HAPPY VALLEY SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION$14,827
OREGON MANUFACTURING EXTENSION PTNP$14,575
REX PUTNAM MUSIC BOOSTERS$13,284
LOVEONE$12,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $302k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOLKTIME INC: $6k → 12%THE INN HOME FOR BOYS: $5k → 12%THE FATHERS HEART: $83k → 8%CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $6k → 8%MOLALLA HOPE: $80k → 8%LOVEONE: $103k → 8%LOVEONE: $13k → 8%FRIENDS OF ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTE: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 11 repeat orgs$566k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +79% since the first grant, against +71% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$24M
$381k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+79%
+71%

Still filing today

82%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +138%
  • NF
    NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2017–2025 · $767k · revenue +251%
  • OM
    Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $416k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • FH
    Fathers Heart Street Ministry
    one grant, 2024 · $83k · revenue 0%
  • MH
    MOLALLA HOPE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0%
  • RO
    Rivers of Life Center
    one grant, 2024 · $80k · revenue 0% · 66% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Beyond These Walls

Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
2
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
3
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal
4
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
5
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
6
Every Child Central Oregon

Mobilizing the community to uplift children and families impacted by foster care in Oregon.

Human Services
7
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
8
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
9
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
10
Outsiders Inn

Outsiders Inn (OI) provides peer-lead homeless services and operates multiple shelter programs with a recovery focused model in the Clark County, WA area.

Housing & Shelter
11
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
12
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals of Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Rex Putnam High School Music Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr19%42%20–35yr12%19%35–55yr15%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr12%68%35–55yr15%2%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
927/7,472

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $14,426,302 · OtherCLACKAMAS COMMUNITY COLLEGECLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRIC — $4,227,082 · OtherCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $3,261,813 · OtherTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION+9 more — $1,255,969 · Other+9 moreOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — $416,465 · Community ImprovementNorth Clackamas Education Foundation — $202,228 · EducationRex Putnam High School Music Boosters — $108,166 · EducationLoveone — $116,099 · Human ServicesFathers Heart Street Ministry — $82,500 · Human ServicesMOLALLA HOPE INC — $80,000 · Human Services+4 more — $23,090 · Human ServicesARTS ACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION DBA CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE — $112,771 · Arts & CultureLAKEWOOD THEATRE COMPANY — $80,000 · Arts & CultureYOUTH MUSIC PROJECT — $80,000 · Arts & CultureTodos Juntos Inc — $76,080 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO CHANGE INC — $6,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $6,000 · Crime & LegalRivers of Life Center — $80,000 · Environment
Other$23,171,166Community Improvement$416,465Education$310,394Human Services$301,689Arts & Culture$272,771Crime & Legal$88,080Environment$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $3,261,813 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES — $766,849 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetOregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — $416,465 over 8y, 4.0% of budgetANTFARM INC — $360,818 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetNorth Clackamas Education Foundation — $202,228 over 2y, 29% of budgetLoveone — $116,099 over 2y, 34% of budgetARTS ACTION ALLIANCE FOUNDATION DBA CLACKAMAS COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE — $112,771 over 2y, 15% of budgetRex Putnam High School Music Boosters — $108,166 over 2y, 56% of budgetFathers Heart Street Ministry — $82,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD THEATRE COMPANY — $80,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRivers of Life Center — $80,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetAMERICAN MILITARY ENCOURAGEMENT NETWORK — $80,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetTodos Juntos Inc — $76,080 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOREGON WORKFORCE PARTNERSHIP — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOLK-TIME INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBRIDGES TO CHANGE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ESTACADA COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS OF OREGON — $5,475 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INN HOME FOR BOYS DBA TRUE HOUSING — $5,090 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …OCF Joseph E Weston P…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Robert D and Marc…Careoregon IncJuan Young TrustMarie Lamfrom Charita…Providence Health & S…The Roundhouse Founda…Clackamas Women's Ser…The Autzen Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR33.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · Careoregon Inc · Juan Young Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · The Roundhouse Foundation · Clackamas Women's Services · The Autzen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc — 83% of income from government
  • Easter Seals of Oregon — 77% of income from government
  • Rivers of Life Center — 65% of income from government
  • Todos Juntos Inc — 64% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association of Oregon — 41% of income from government
  • Bridges to Change Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
  • American Military Encouragement Network — 31% of income from government
  • Antfarm Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Folk-Time Inc — 26% of income from government
  • Parrott Creek Child and Family Services — 20% of income from government
  • Loveone — 12% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Arts Action Alliance Foundation Dba Clackamas County Arts Alliance — 9% of income from government
  • Oregon Workforce Partnership — 5% of income from government
  • The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
  • Youth Music Project — 1% of income from government
  • Casa of Clackamas County — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines