· Public charity
Clackamas Women's Services
Breaking the isolation of domestic and sexual violence.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $2,346,974 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,548,432 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,201,458 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $648k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $631,804 |
| ANTFARM | $532,159 |
| NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES | $463,358 |
| IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $190,125 |
| Individual grant recipient | $178,173 |
| LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON | $127,651 |
| SAFETY COMPASS | $84,195 |
| LOVEONE | $67,522 |
| CAMP ARRAH WANNA | $29,737 |
| A VILLAGE FOR ONE | $19,774 |
| BLOOMIN' BOUTIQUE | $11,976 |
| CHILDREN'S CENTER | $10,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $453k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NFNORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES3× · 2022–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +12%
THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION3× · 2023–2025 · $448k · revenue +10%- LALEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON3× · 2023–2025 · $304k · revenue +11%
Funded once
NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVESone grant, 2024 · $321k · revenue 0%
CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTYone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
Todos Juntos Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $49k · revenue +56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
Advocate for victims of crime within the criminal justice system and protective order cases; provide referrals to social-service agencies that can help crime victims recover. the center's services are available statewide at no cost to…
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
To protect children, support families, and bring hope and healing through compassionate, coordinated, and child-centered advocacy, through specialized programs and services, such as multi-disciplinary team coordination, forensic…
Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.
Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…
CASA's Goal is to provide a carefully researched background of the children who are experiencing abuse and neglect to help the court make a sound decision about the childrens future.
Provide care to refugee families.
Casa of eastern oregon is dedicated to making a difference in the lives of abused and neglected children from baker, grant, harney, lake, malheur, union and wallowa counties through volunteer advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safety Compass and the most unlike its peers is Camp Arrah Wanna Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANTFARM INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds SAFETY COMPASS ↗
- Who funds A VILLAGE FOR ONE ↗
- Who funds CAMP ARRAH WANNA INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMIN BOUTIQUE ↗
- Who funds Childrens Center ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO ↗
- Who funds Loveone ↗
- Who funds Todos Juntos Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Workforce Investment Council of Clackamas County · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Meyer Memorial Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Juan Young Trust · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clackamas Women's Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Todos Juntos Inc — 64% of income from government
- Northwest Family Services — 35% of income from government
- A Village for One — 33% of income from government
- Antfarm Inc — 29% of income from government
- Safety Compass — 25% of income from government
- El Programa Hispano Catolico — 13% of income from government
- Loveone — 12% of income from government
- Legal Aid Services of Oregon — 10% of income from government
- The Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization — 4% of income from government
- Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
- Casa of Clackamas County — 0% of income from government
- Childrens Center — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.