Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Cityserve International

The mission of CITYSERVE INTERNATIONAL is to train, equip and mobilize the local church to live out the gospel of jesus christ in its community through compassion.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$634k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Youth Development$3.3MFood & Nutrition$1.7MInternational$1.2MReligion$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$587kEnvironment$350kHuman Services$171kCivil Rights$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $1,977,927 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,750,792 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $772,865 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $343k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$50,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITYSERVE NETWORK$633,748
NEIGHBORHOODS TO NATIONS$500,000
SPOKES OF HOPE$301,500
NATIONAL FAITH ADVISORY BOARD$115,000
Individual grant recipient$70,000
CANYON HILLS CHURCH$54,000
180 DISASTER RELIEF$53,500
THE CITYSERVE FOUNDATION$50,000
UNITED IN PURPOSE$49,990
AACC - AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN COUNSELORS$43,516
A21 USA$30,000
CHURCH OF HOPE$25,000
VOICE OF THE VETERAN$16,673
MEDIC CORPS$15,000
GIVING HOPE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOODLINK: $23k → 14%GIVING HOPE: $10k → 23%FURNISHING FAMILIES INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 11%A21 USA: $30k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
NV
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
AR
TN
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $402k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$327k · 81% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT TO ESTABLISH CITYSERVE ISRAEL

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$75k · 19% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: UKRAINE ORPHANAGE SUPPORT · UKRAINE CRISIS SUPPORT - BIBLICAL TEXT BILLBOARDS IN UKRAINE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 29% of Cityserve International’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Cityserve Internationallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 15% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 9 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
39

Total granted

$6.2M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+8%

Still filing today

44%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NT
    Neighborhoods to Nations
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +135% · 53% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ARISE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $312k · revenue +25%
  • NC
    No Child Hungry Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $245k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CH
    CANYON HILLS ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    one grant, 2018 · $500k
  • SO
    SPOKES OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $350k
  • NY
    NEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $256k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cityserve International

The mission of cityserve international is to train, equip and mobilize the local church to live out the gospel of jesus christ in its community through compassion.

Arts & Culture
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

3
Food for the Cities

We are a ministry of servants that lead souls to Jesus Christ and leave a lasting impact on the world for Gods glory. Our vision is to save the people of the USA, Amazon and the World with the Gospel of Jesus Christ and disciple them into…

Human Services
4
Truth to Table

Our mission is to reach as many people as possible with the truth of Gods Word through video based products, practical resources and lifestyle tools.

Religion
5
Cross Connecting Network

The Cross Connecting Network connects people ideas and resources to support the global Church through networking church planting leadership and vocational training community development and humanitarian aid.

Religion
6
Kingdom Building Ministries

This mission of Forge is to expand Gods Kingdom by challenging people to fully devote their lives to God and equipping them to live lives of active ministry. Our goal is to set hearts on fire and lives on purpose.

7
The Urban Alternative

The Urban Alternative is a Christian Ministry that seeks to equip, empower, and unite Christians to impact individuals, families, churches, and communities for the rebuilding of lives from the inside out.

Religion
8
Worldserve Ministries

To advance the gospel in closed and hard-to-reach nations and to impact those nations for christ.

International
9
Church Transformation Network Inc

CTNs mission is to partner with national churches to economically and effectively train large numbers of Christian leaders in their calling character and ministry competency so that local communities of faith remain biblical faithful and…

Religion
10
World Renew

Compelled by a deep passion for justice and mercy, World Renew joins communities around the world to renew hope, reconcile lives, and restore creation with programs focused on disaster response, community health, economic opportunity, food…

11
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
12
2 Cities Church Inc

At 2 Cities Church, we are driven by a powerful mission: to spread the good news of Jesus and make a positive impact on the world. Our church was founded on a shared vision of creating a community of believers that transcends race and…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Christian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Social ServicesFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%16%<5yr15%25%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%16%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%5%<5yr15%77%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%1%20–35yr11%5%35–55yr13%8%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 16% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/38
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,940

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITYSERVE NETWORK — $3,324,502 · Youth DevelopmentCITYSERVE NETWORK180 DISASTER RELIEF — $643,155 · Other180 DISASTER RELIEFCANYON HILLS ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $500,000 · OtherCANYON HILLS ASSEMBLY OF GODSPOKES OF HOPE — $350,000 · OtherSPOKES OF HOPENEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INC — $256,066 · OtherNEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INCNATIONAL FAITH ADVISORY BOARD INC — $215,000 · OtherNATIONAL FAITH ADVISORY BOARD INCCANYON HILLS CHURCH — $156,340 · OtherHOPEFUL REGISTRATION GROUP CO SPOKES OF HOPE — $133,268 · Other+36 more — $943,070 · Other+36 moreNeighborhoods to Nations — $1,075,000 · InternationalNeighborhoods to …WORLD VISION INC — $265,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCTHE ARISE FOUNDATION — $311,500 · PhilanthropyNo Child Hungry Inc — $245,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $15,330 · Food & NutritionGODS WAREHOUSE INC — $9,716 · Food & NutritionUnited in Purpose — $124,990 · Civil RightsCityServe KC Co — $30,000 · ReligionDr James Dobson Family Institute — $25,000 · ReligionOne Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders — $10,000 · ReligionTEN TALENTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · ReligionRURAL COMPASSION — $9,828 · ReligionIRON GATE INC — $6,528 · Religion
Youth Development$3,324,502Other$3,196,899International$1,340,000Philanthropy$311,500Food & Nutrition$270,046Civil Rights$124,990Religion$91,356

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCITYSERVE NETWORK — $3,324,502 over 6y, 10% of budgetNeighborhoods to Nations — $1,075,000 over 4y, 53% of budgetTHE ARISE FOUNDATION — $311,500 over 2y, 25% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $265,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INC — $256,066 over 1y, 17% of budgetNo Child Hungry Inc — $245,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION ALABAMA — $33,838 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCityServe KC Co — $30,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetA21 USA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDr James Dobson Family Institute — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOODLINK FOUNDATION INC — $22,806 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK — $15,330 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGiving Hope Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKansas City Dream Center Co — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOne Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFURNISHING FAMILIES OF TEXAS DBA FURNISHING FAMILIES INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTEN TALENTS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetRURAL COMPASSION — $9,828 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGODS WAREHOUSE INC — $9,716 over 1y, 16% of budgetIRON GATE INC — $6,528 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CITYSERVE NETWORK
  • Who funds Neighborhoods to Nations
  • Who funds THE ARISE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds NEW YORK SCHOOL OF URBAN MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds No Child Hungry Inc
  • Who funds United in Purpose
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
  • Who funds MISSION ALABAMA
  • Who funds CityServe KC Co
  • Who funds A21 USA INC
  • Who funds Dr James Dobson Family Institute
  • Who funds FOODLINK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL NEW YORK
  • Who funds Giving Hope Inc
  • Who funds Kansas City Dream Center Co
  • Who funds One Love Initiative dba Circuit Riders

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS19.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · World Vision Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cityserve International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cityserve International?

    Find your warmest path to Cityserve International through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph