Skip to content
Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$235kHuman Services$73kEducation$66kRecreation & Sports$54kArts & Culture$41kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$19kCommunity Improvement$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT MINISTRIES$15,000
BREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC$10,500
WARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY$8,466
WESLEY FOOD PANTRY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YOUTH OF IMPACT$5,000
NEWBURGH MUSEUM FOUNDATION$4,500
ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INC$4,000
NEWBURGH UNITED WOMEN OF FAITH$4,000
MAIN SREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
CHANDLER YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOC$3,690
WARRICK RESOURCE CENTER$3,500
WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORP$2,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INC: $5k → 15%YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INC: $3k → 15%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 7%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 7%GEM MINISTRIES: $3k → 7%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$531k · 32 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
24

Total granted

$531k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+103%

Still filing today

34%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE
    5× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue +408%
  • CB
    CHEMO BUDDIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +2%
  • WL
    WARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • LD
    LOGE DEVELOPMENTAL PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CU
    CHANDLER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • PE
    PURDUE EXTENSION PROGRAM
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Warrick Wellness Pathways Inc

Promote health and wellness through the funding, designing and construction of bike and walkway paths throughout warrick county, indiana.

Human Services
2
Wasco Co Historical Museum
Arts & Culture
3
Warrick County Casa Inc

To recruit volunteers to represent children

Crime & Legal
4
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department of Starke County Indiana

Volunteer fire department

—
5
Starke County Historical Society

Preserve history of starke county indiana

—
6
Westville Community Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Providing fire protection to the citizens of new durham township, jackson township, and town of westville, located in laporte/porter counties, indiana. also promotion of fire prevention and safety.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Warrick Parks & Trails Foundation Inc

The warrick parks foundation is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to developing and maintaining the beautiful parks, trails and public spaces of warrick county for the enjoyment of residents and visitors for generations to come.

Environment
8
Clark County Museum

We are a non-profit county museum, in Clark County Indiana.

Arts & Culture
9
Dunkirk Industrial Development Corp

Promoting economic development in dunkirk, indiana

—
10
Warwick Day Care Center Inc

Daycare and learning center; early childhood development.

Human Services
11
Wabash Valley Recovery Center
Health
12
Newburgh Junior Baseball Inc

Provision and management of baseball leagues for children ages four to fourteen residing in warrick county indiana

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Evansville Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is God Is Good Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC: $88,200 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INCCHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCH: $42,500 · OtherCHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCHNEWBURGH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $37,000 · OtherNEWBURGH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $36,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORP: $23,540 · OtherBOONVILLE BIKE CLUB INC: $17,500 · Other+41 more: $268,294 · Other+41 moreENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE: $28,300 · ReligionWarrick County Council on Aging Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $6,246 · Human ServicesGEM MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesBOONVILLE NOW INC: $17,600 · Community ImprovementGOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Community ImprovementWARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC: $15,000 · EducationOAKDALE PARENTS & TEACHERS INC: $5,000 · EducationWARRICK PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationCHEMO BUDDIES: $17,600 · HealthYOUTH FIRST: $5,000 · HealthWARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,466 · Animals
Other$513,534Religion$28,300Human Services$26,746Community Improvement$25,100Education$24,000Health$22,600Animals$10,466

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE: $28,300 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetBOONVILLE NOW INC: $17,600 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCHEMO BUDDIES: $17,600 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetHISTORIC NEWBURGH INC: $11,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,466 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWarrick County Council on Aging Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetJD SHETH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC: $6,246 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAKDALE PARENTS & TEACHERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetWARRICK PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetWARRICK COUNTY MUSEUM INC: $3,119 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGEM MINISTRIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPARK PALS INC: $2,821 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCASTLE LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC: $2,400 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE ↗
  • Who funds BOONVILLE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEMO BUDDIES ↗
  • Who funds WARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC NEWBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds WARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Warrick County Council on Aging Inc ↗
  • Who funds JD SHETH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
  • Who funds OAKDALE PARENTS & TEACHERS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Len…Community Foundation …Centerpoint Energy Fo…Deaconess Hospital IncWelborn Baptist Found…James R Duncan Trust …C Richard Johnson & V…Holiday Management Fo…St Mary's Health IncThe Bower-Suhrheinric…Baird Foundation IncElizabeth Albon Found…
Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · C Richard Johnson & Verna Louise Johnson Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · St Mary's Health Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Baird Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Albon Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home