Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$93k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 78% of CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SOCIETY OF BOONVILLE IRRV TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMPACT MINISTRIES$15,000
BREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC$10,500
WARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY$8,466
WESLEY FOOD PANTRY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
CHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCH$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
YOUTH OF IMPACT$5,000
NEWBURGH MUSEUM FOUNDATION$4,500
ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INC$4,000
NEWBURGH UNITED WOMEN OF FAITH$4,000
MAIN SREET UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,000
CHANDLER YOUTH BASKETBALL ASSOC$3,690
WARRICK RESOURCE CENTER$3,500
WARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORP$2,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INC: $5k → 15%YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INC: $3k → 15%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $5k → 7%GEM MINISTRIES: $3k → 7%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $3k → 7%WARRICK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$531k · 32 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
24

Total granted

$531k
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+103%

Still filing today

34%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthReligionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE
    5× · 2018–2025 · $28k · revenue +91%
  • CB
    CHEMO BUDDIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18k · revenue +2%
  • WL
    WARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • LD
    LOGE DEVELOPMENTAL PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CU
    CHANDLER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • HP
    HEMENWAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Warrick Wellness Pathways Inc

Promote health and wellness through the funding, designing and construction of bike and walkway paths throughout warrick county, indiana.

Human Services
2
Wasco Co Historical Museum
Arts & Culture
3
Warrick County Casa Inc

To recruit volunteers to represent children

Crime & Legal
4
Washington Township Volunteer Fire Department of Starke County Indiana

Volunteer fire department

5
Starke County Historical Society

Preserve history of starke county indiana

6
Westville Community Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Providing fire protection to the citizens of new durham township, jackson township, and town of westville, located in laporte/porter counties, indiana. also promotion of fire prevention and safety.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Warrick Parks & Trails Foundation Inc

The warrick parks foundation is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to developing and maintaining the beautiful parks, trails and public spaces of warrick county for the enjoyment of residents and visitors for generations to come.

Environment
8
Clark County Museum

We are a non-profit county museum, in Clark County Indiana.

Arts & Culture
9
Dunkirk Industrial Development Corp

Promoting economic development in dunkirk, indiana

10
Warwick Day Care Center Inc

Daycare and learning center; early childhood development.

Human Services
11
Wabash Valley Recovery Center
Health
12
Newburgh Junior Baseball Inc

Provision and management of baseball leagues for children ages four to fourteen residing in warrick county indiana

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Evansville Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is God Is Good Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Healthcare Prov…Youth Development and Educa…Evansville Regional Develop…Family Philanthropic Founda…Community Service Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $88,200 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE MINISTRIES INCCHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCH — $42,500 · OtherCHANDLER CUMBERLAND PRES CHURCHNEWBURGH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $37,000 · OtherNEWBURGH UNITED METHODIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $36,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWARRICK COUNTY SCHOOL CORP — $23,540 · OtherBOONVILLE BIKE CLUB INC — $17,500 · Other+41 more — $268,294 · Other+41 moreENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE — $28,300 · ReligionWarrick County Council on Aging Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC — $7,500 · Human ServicesALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC — $6,246 · Human ServicesGEM MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesBOONVILLE NOW INC — $17,600 · Community ImprovementGOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · Community ImprovementWARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC — $15,000 · EducationOAKDALE PARENTS & TEACHERS INC — $5,000 · EducationWARRICK PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 · EducationCHEMO BUDDIES — $17,600 · HealthYOUTH FIRST — $5,000 · HealthWARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $10,466 · Animals
Other$513,534Religion$28,300Human Services$26,746Community Improvement$25,100Education$24,000Health$22,600Animals$10,466

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE — $28,300 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCHEMO BUDDIES — $17,600 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetBOONVILLE NOW INC — $17,600 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetWARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetHISTORIC NEWBURGH INC — $11,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $10,466 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWarrick County Council on Aging Inc — $10,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJD SHETH FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC — $6,246 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH FIRST — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAKDALE PARENTS & TEACHERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetWARRICK PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetWARRICK COUNTY MUSEUM INC — $3,119 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGEM MINISTRIES INC — $3,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPARK PALS INC — $2,821 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCASTLE LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC — $2,400 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetTRI-STATE FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENCOUNTERING HOPE MINISTRIES INCORPORATE
  • Who funds CHEMO BUDDIES
  • Who funds BOONVILLE NOW INC
  • Who funds WARRICK LITERACY AND EDUCATIONAL CONNECTIONS INC
  • Who funds HISTORIC NEWBURGH INC
  • Who funds WARRICK HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Warrick County Council on Aging Inc
  • Who funds YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC
  • Who funds JD SHETH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GOD IS GOOD FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation IncIN28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Deaconess Hospital Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · C Richard Johnson & Verna Louise Johnson Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · St Mary's Health Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third · Baird Foundation Inc · Elizabeth Albon Foundation Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Christian Science Society of Boonville Irrv Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph