Skip to content
Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc

Educational, charitable, missionary, and other as part of the ministry of Christ Episcopal Church.

$129k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$426kHuman Services$214kHousing & Shelter$153kHealth$95kYouth Development$43kPhilanthropy$37kFood & Nutrition$12kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $58,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $128,667 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $70,167 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $45k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity$15,000
Academy of Goal Achievers$10,000
Southminster Foundation$10,000
Safe Alliance$10,000
Wayfinders$7,500
The ROC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Safe Alliance: $15k → 10%Safe Alliance: $12k → 10%Safe Alliance: $10k → 10%Safe Alliance: $10k → 10%Safe Alliance: $10k → 10%Safe Alliance: $10k → 10%Safe Alliance: $10k → 10%RAIN Inc: $9k → 10%Ourbridge for Kids: $8k → 10%Ourbridge for Kids: $8k → 10%Ourbridge for kids: $8k → 10%Braveworks: $13k → 10%Fashion & Compassion: $10k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $27k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $27k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $10k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $10k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $10k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $10k → 10%Southminster Foundation: $10k → 10%Supportive Housing Communitie: $10k → 10%Supportive Housing Communitie: $10k → 10%Foster Village Charlotte: $10k → 10%Supportive Housing Communitie: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$920k · 12 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
6

Total granted

$920k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+196%

Still filing today

83%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    Habitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region
    8× · 2017–2024 · $123k · revenue +210%
  • SA
    Safe Alliance Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $77k · revenue +164%
  • HF
    HopeWay Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $60k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • RS
    REFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +234%
  • GM
    Galilee Ministries of East Ch
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • FV
    Foster Village Charlottegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +332%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
2
Safe Harbor of Nc Inc

Safe Harbor provides a faith-based community for rebuilding, renewing, and recovery. We work together with volunteers and other nonprofit organizations to provide a wide range of services to those experiencing homelessness, single mothers,…

Health
3
Srv Inc

Engaging leaders in distressed communities with strategies that deliver hope.

International
4
Promise Resource Network Inc

Through the wisdom of lived recovery experience, we ignite social change, inspire hope and serve as a catalyst for personal greatness.

Health
5
Every Shelter Inc

Every Shelter's mission is to build a localized refugee-aid ecosystem centered around the needs, preferences, and aspirations of refugees.

Education
6
Residential Opportunities Inc

We partner with children and adults with disabilities and their families so they may live more meaningful, healthy, and independent lives in their homes and communities.

Human Services
7
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
8
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
9
Community Affordable Residences Enterprise Inc

To create an equitable and just community through high quality affordable housing and transformative resident services. We envision a community where an affordable home is available to everyone.

Housing & Shelter
10
Asylee Women Enterprise Inc

Asylee Women Enterprise (AWE), journeys with asylum seekers and other forced migrants as they navigate the immigration legal process, begin to heal from past trauma, and rebuild their lives in Baltimore.

International
11
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
12
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southminster Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $416,175 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region: $122,800 · OtherHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region+2 more: $16,000 · OtherSafe Alliance Inc: $77,000 · Human ServicesSafe Alliance IncSOUTHMINSTER FOUNDATION INC: $66,667 · Human ServicesSOUTHMINSTER FOUNDATION INCSOUTHMINSTER INC: $36,667 · Human ServicesSOUTHMINSTER INCSupportive Housing Communities Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesSupportive Housing Communities In…ourBRIDGE Inc: $22,500 · Human ServicesourBRIDGE IncBRAVEWORKS: $22,500 · Human ServicesBRAVEWORKSREFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesFoster Village Charlotte: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesHopeWay Foundation: $60,000 · HealthHopeWay F…Care Ring Inc: $26,000 · HealthCare Ring…The Academy of Goal Achievers: $27,500 · EducationR Bruce Irons Camp Fund: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentPROFOUND GENTLEMEN INC: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionRACE MATTERS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE: $7,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$554,975Human Services$289,334Health$86,000Education$27,500Youth Development$15,000Food & Nutrition$12,000Crime & Legal$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHabitat For Humanity Of The Charlotte Region: $122,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc: $77,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetHopeWay Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHMINSTER INC: $36,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSupportive Housing Communities Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Academy of Goal Achievers: $27,500 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetCare Ring Inc: $26,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetourBRIDGE Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBRAVEWORKS: $22,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetREFUGEE SUPPORT SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoster Village Charlotte: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetRAIN Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetR Bruce Irons Camp Fund: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPROFOUND GENTLEMEN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRACE MATTERS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE: $7,500 over 1y, 9.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the Ca…United Way of Greater…Duke Energy FoundationThe Leon Levine Found…Albemarle FoundationThe Presbyterian Hosp…Merancas Foundation I…Ally Charitable Found…Womens Impact FundCharlotte Woman's Clu…Philip L Van Every Fo…The Cannon Foundation…
Foundation for the CarolinasNC33.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Presbyterian Hospital · Merancas Foundation Inc · Ally Charitable Foundation · Womens Impact Fund · Charlotte Woman's Club First Citizens Bank · Philip L Van Every Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Christ Episcopal Church Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christ Episcopal Church’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home