Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chopivsky Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$753kArts & Culture$196kReligion$176kEducation$139kHousing & Shelter$21kYouth Development$10kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ALBANS SCHOOL$25,000
UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$25,000
NATIONAL CATHERDRAL SCHOOL$20,000
THE ORCHESTRA OF THE AMERICAS GROUP$10,000
ST ANDREWS UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX$7,500
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY$5,000
ASSOCIAZION XENIA ENSEMBLE$5,000
US-UKRAINE FOUNDATION$5,000
NOVA UKRAINE$5,000
BEAUVOIR SCHOOL$2,500
BEAUVOIR SCHOOL$2,500
TARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIA$2,500
WOMEN'S FOREIGN POLICY GROUP$1,000
Individual grant recipient$250
YALE UNIVERSITY CLUB$95
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$880k · 29 repeat orgs$618k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
37

Total granted

$880k
$595k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+65%

Still filing today

52%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24
InternationalEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $250k · revenue +135%
  • UI
    UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $146k · revenue +20%
  • UU
    UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $46k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • UU
    UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $280k
  • UW
    UKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • KO
    KYIV ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ACADEMY
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ukrainian Museum

The mission of the ukrainian museum is to acquire, preserve, exhibit & interpret articles of artistic, historic, & scientific value related to ukrainian life & culture; to promote all aspects of ukrainian culture; & to educate the public…

Arts & Culture
2
Ukraine Freedom Project

Conveying factual, accurate, unbiased, first hand information about ukraine to policymakers and the public at large

International
3
American University of Armenia Corporation

Support of the educational and research activities of the american university of armenia (aua).

Education
4
University Studies Abroad Consortium

The mission of universities studies abroad consortium ("usac") is to provide students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to succeed in the global society of the 21st century. we strive to provide an…

Education
5
Ukrainian Academy of Arts & Sciences in the U S Inc

Research, advancement and promotion of Ukrainian studies and culture in the United States.

Arts & Culture
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Ukraine Defense Fund Inc

To provide humanitarian aid to citizens and soldiers of ukraine.

International
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ukrainian National Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is Central Loudoun Basketball League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEF: $280,000 · OtherUNITED UKRANIAN AMERICAN RELIEFIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION USA: $100,000 · OtherUKRAINIAN WORLD FOUNDATION USAKYIV ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ACADEMY: $100,000 · OtherKYIV ORTHODOX THEOLOGICAL ACADEMYPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF C: $63,520 · OtherPROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CATHEDRAL FOUNDATION OF THE D OF CUNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC: $45,750 · Other+40 more: $212,820 · Other+40 moreATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $250,000 · InternationalATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE…JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION: $25,000 · InternationalJAMESTOWN FOUNDATIONU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $11,000 · International+7 more: $15,644 · InternationalUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $145,500 · Arts & CultureUKRAINIAN INST…Orchestra of the Americas Group Inc: $31,030 · Arts & CultureOrchestra of t…TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureUKRAINE GLOBAL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $8,500 · EducationTARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIAN STUDIES OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $7,800 · EducationNATIONAL CHILD RESEARCH CENTER: $1,500 · EducationLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $1,000 · Education+3 more: $1,400 · EducationCENTRAL LOUDOUN BASKETBALL LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentKYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $6,500 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY: $5,000 · Public Benefit
Other$952,090International$316,644Arts & Culture$187,530Education$20,200Youth Development$10,000Philanthropy$6,500Public Benefit$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $145,500 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetUNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC: $45,750 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetOrchestra of the Americas Group Inc: $31,030 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetJAMESTOWN FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetRAZOM INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL LOUDOUN BASKETBALL LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION GROUP: $10,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetUKRAINE GLOBAL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIAN STUDIES OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $7,800 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetKYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $6,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUkrainian Catholic University Foundation: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS FOREIGN POLICY GROUP INC: $2,144 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOMEN FORWARD INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD RESEARCH CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUKRAINIAN HISTORY AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMOLOSKYP INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY COUNCIL: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ENGLISH CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUKRAINIAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINIAN INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED UKRAINIAN AMERICAN RELIEF COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds Orchestra of the Americas Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL LOUDOUN BASKETBALL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUST FOR THE NATIONAL MALL ↗
  • Who funds TRANSNATIONAL EDUCATION GROUP ↗
  • Who funds UKRAINE GLOBAL SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TARAS SHEVCHENKO SCHOOL OF UKRAINIAN STUDIES OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds KYIV MOHYLA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Catholic University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation IncNY15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Inc · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · New York Self Reliance Foundation Ltd · The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Inc · The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Inc · Brillembourg Ochoa Family Foundation Inc · Sami & Annie Totah Family Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chopivsky Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chopivsky Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Chesapeake Bay Trust: 100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chopivsky Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chopivsky Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chopivsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph