Skip to content

Illinois · Public charity

Choose Chicago Foundation

The CHOOSE CHICAGO FOUNDATION accelerates the civic, cultural, and economic growth of chicago through travel and tourism initiatives.

$197k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
Organizations funded FY2023
100%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2023
$85,000
Largest grant, FY2023
$102,221
Organizations funded a year
3 to 15
FY2021 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
1
Total assets, FY2023
$782k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 100% of the organizations Choose Chicago Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 100% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
EducationCommunity Improvement
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20233$112k100%
FY20223$71k0%
FY202115$2.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Community Improvement$2.1MArts & Culture$256kHealth$250kEducation$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 18 grantees

Where it is load-bearing

Choose Chicago Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUptown United: $261,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetPuerto Rican Cultural Center: $255,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetDevcorp North Dba Rogers Park Business Alliance: $250,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetSouth Chicago Parents & Friends Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetBack of the Yards Neighborhood Council: $250,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNorthwest Side Community Development Cor: $220,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetGreater Chatham Initiative: $220,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetAustin Chamber of Commerce: $142,800 over 1y, 66% of budgetDevelopment Now for Chicago: $102,221 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLittle Village Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSouth Shore Chamber Community Development Corp: $98,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWoodlawn Chamber of Commerce: $79,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetMorgan Park-Beverly Hills Business Association: $75,000 over 1y, 49% of budgetLogan Square Chamber of Commerce: $73,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetLake View East Chamber of Commerce: $50,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNational Louis University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDepaul University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Coleman Foundation IncIL19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Coleman Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Small Business Advocacy Council · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Women's Business Development Center · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Choose Chicago Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Choose Chicago Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Choose Chicago Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Choose Chicago Foundation

How much does Choose Chicago Foundation give?
Choose Chicago Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $197,231 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 15 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2023.
What does Choose Chicago Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2023, its largest causes are Community Improvement (80%), Arts & Culture (10%), Health (10%).
Who are Choose Chicago Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2023: Uptown United ($261k), Puerto Rican Cultural Center ($256k), Devcorp North Dba Rogers Park Business Alliance ($250k).
Does Choose Chicago Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 100% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Choose Chicago Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Coleman Foundation Inc, The Chicago Community Trust, John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation.
Where is Choose Chicago Foundation based?
Choose Chicago Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $17M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Choose Chicago’s filings →

More from the funding graph