Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Women's Business Development Center

The mission of the WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER (wbdc) is to support and accelerate business development and growth, serving all business owners to strengthen their participation in, and impact on, the economy.

$5.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$368k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Community Improvement$88MEducation$158kCrime & Legal$40kEmployment$35kHuman Services$30kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$20kAnimals$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 50 grants below total $5,548,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,884,199 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $335,499 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k45 grants · $4.2M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.3M
$75,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$368,105
ILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION$321,693
BERWYN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$311,116
ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS FKA ACCION CHICAGO INC$303,771
SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY$168,509
CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC$156,817
SEA CRAFT LLC$150,000
HT23 CUSTOM CRAFTERS LLC$150,000
PUBLIC SQUARE LLC$150,000
33RD DIVISION A MINORITY VETERANS UNIT LLC$150,000
GALAXY LABS LLC$150,000
CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE$142,946
GREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$121,237
ORGANIC URBAN REVITALIZATION SOLUTIONS LLC$100,000
IMPERIAL PRODUCTS LLC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%QUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE: $137k → 8%HARMONY COMMUNITY CARES: $25k → 14%TOUCH GIFT FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 147 repeat orgs$40M to everyone else

147 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 137 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

147
1814

Total granted

$10M
$37M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+5%

Still filing today

10%
1%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +59%
  • AF
    ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $996k · revenue +11%
  • IR
    ILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $893k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • HM
    HELEN MILLER - SEIU MEMBER EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $158k · revenue +5%
  • QC
    QUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $137k · revenue +84%
  • ST
    SEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $106k · revenue +127%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cook County Chamber
Philanthropy
2
West Ridge Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development in the west ridge area community of chicago

3
Oak Lawn Chamber of Commerce

To represent and advance its business community striving with constant integrity fairness and cooperation to promote and improve the economic atmosphere business climate and image of Oak Lawn

4
Emerald South Economic Development Colloborative

To ensure that access and opportunities are shared to benefit residents and business owners of chicagos southside. we aim to foster growth of local businesses and leaders, attract new investment, develop our local labor workforce and…

5
Chicagoland Entrepreneurial Center

The center promotes and grows chicagos entrepreneurial community.

Community Improvement
6
Oak Park River Forest Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is a member organization proud to serve businesses in Oak Park, River Forest , Forest Park and the surrounding areas. We Provide leadership, information, events, workshops and opportunities for networking and relationship…

7
East Edgewater Chamber of Commerce

The Edgewater Chamber of Commerce's mission is to create and support a thriving business environment, contributing to a vibrant Edgewater community. We present marketing, networking, education, and one-on-one assistance to businesses.

8
Melrose Park Chamber of Commerce and Community Development Nfp

The melrose park chamber of commerce and community development mission as a non-profit is to provide economic opprtunities.

Community Improvement
9
Local Economic and Employment Development Council Inc

North Branch Works is a membership-supported nonprofit neighborhood organization that for more than three decades has promoted balanced, job-creating economic development along the North Branch of the Chicago River.

Employment
10
Northcenter Chamber of Commerce

To advance civic, economic, industrial, professional, and cultural welfare of the business community.

11
Logan Square Chamber of Commerce

Over 150 business members in Logan Square Area served through technical assistance, events, marketing and advocacy opportunities and services through the Chamber of Commerce.

Community Improvement
12
The Veterans Exchange

Employment support and exchange for veterans

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southland Development Authority Nfp and the most unlike its peers is American Legion Post 365. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%8%<5yr14%19%5–10yr18%11%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.1%3/2,315
the rest of the field
15%
4,318/29,195

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC — $1,115,876 · OtherMEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION — $893,131 · OtherILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATIONSOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NFP — $673,289 · OtherSOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NFP+177 more — $7,858,030 · Other+177 moreBERWYN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,016,396 · Community ImprovementBERWYN DEVELOPMENT CORP…ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $996,355 · Community ImprovementALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BU…CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $418,347 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLI…CHICAGO NEW BUSINESS NFP — $152,653 · Community ImprovementGREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP — $147,998 · Community ImprovementSEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $105,665 · Community Improvement+4 more — $125,000 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE — $520,850 · EmploymentGreater Englewood Chamber of Commerce — $30,000 · EmploymentNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $25,000 · EmploymentQUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC — $136,751 · Human ServicesHARMONY COMMUNITY CARES NFP — $25,000 · Human ServicesTOUCH GIFT FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesHELEN MILLER - SEIU MEMBER EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER — $158,296 · EducationBUSINESS SERVICES COLLECTIVE NFP DBA BUILDERS AVENUE — $65,803 · Civil RightsTHE JOSEPH CENTER — $50,620 · Recreation & SportsDISHROULETTE KITCHEN NFP — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$10,540,326Community Improvement$2,962,414Employment$575,850Human Services$186,751Education$158,296Civil Rights$65,803Recreation & Sports$50,620Food & Nutrition$25,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC — $1,115,876 over 4y, 13% of budgetBERWYN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,016,396 over 4y, 19% of budgetALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC — $996,355 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION — $893,131 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetSOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NFP — $673,289 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetCHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE — $520,850 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $418,347 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetHELEN MILLER - SEIU MEMBER EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER — $158,296 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetDEVCORP NORTH DBA ROGERS PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE — $157,719 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetCHICAGO NEW BUSINESS NFP — $152,653 over 3y, 34% of budgetGREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP — $147,998 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetQUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC — $136,751 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION — $105,665 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetTHE JOSEPH CENTER — $50,620 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNEW COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetGreater Englewood Chamber of Commerce — $30,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetSOUTHWEST COLLECTIVE — $30,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetSouth Shore Chamber Community Development Corp — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDISHROULETTE KITCHEN NFP — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHARMONY COMMUNITY CARES NFP — $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHICAGO'S SUNSHINE ENTERPRISES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNORTH LAWNDALE EMPLOYMENT NETWORK — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEXICAN AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERC
  • Who funds BERWYN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds ALLIES FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS INC
  • Who funds ILLINOIS RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SOUTHLAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NFP
  • Who funds CHICAGO URBAN LEAGUE
  • Who funds CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
  • Who funds HELEN MILLER - SEIU MEMBER EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER
  • Who funds DEVCORP NORTH DBA ROGERS PARK BUSINESS ALLIANCE
  • Who funds CHICAGO NEW BUSINESS NFP
  • Who funds GREATER SOUTHWEST DEVELOPMENT CORP
  • Who funds QUAD COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds SEIZE THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

Small Business Advocacy CouncilIL16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Small Business Advocacy Council · Illinois Action for Children · Choose Chicago Foundation · Chicago Food Policy Action Council · Chicago Urban League · Center for Neighborhood Technology · Somercor 504 Inc · Latinos Progresando · Public Health Institute of Metropolitan Chicago · Marquette Bank Affordable Housing Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Allies for Community Business Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Women's Business Development Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph