· Private foundation
Chiron Community Giving Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $189k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $183k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEBSTER UNIVERSITY | $110,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS | $72,896 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI | $25,950 |
| WALTERS WALK | $23,513 |
| SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS | $22,758 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS | $17,500 |
| VILLAGE | $15,000 |
| REFUGE AND RESTORATION | $15,000 |
| WYMAN CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| KINGDOM HOUSE | $12,300 |
| CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI | $11,140 |
| ST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK | $10,841 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS | $10,000 |
| GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| WEBSTER UNIVERSITY | $9,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $86k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $229k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WUWebster University2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +31%
- WWWALTER'S WALK3× · 2022–2024 · $49k · revenue +133%
- TWTHE WYMAN CENTER3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +60%
Funded once
- CCCHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +52%
- SLSt Louis Queer Support & Healinggraduatedone grant, 2022 · $9k · revenue +226%
- HLHAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLSone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.
Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.
Founded In 2018, Teach St. Louis (formerly St. Louis Teacher Residency) launched to improve teacher quality and retention in St. Louis, a city where 40% of new teachers exit the classroom in their first three years. Teach St. Louis…
As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.
Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…
Conflict Resolution Center St. Louis empowers people to resolve conflict through accessible mediation, coaching, and education.
NAMI St. Louis provides education, advocacy, and support essential to the recovery, resilience, and well-being of all who have mental health needs and for their families, caregivers, and the community.
To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…
The St. Louis Workers Education Society (WES) educates and trains St. Louis residents, especially people of color, women and youth, to become community leaders. Our focus is on the intersection of workers rights, racial justice, sexual and…
To provide children with hope, understanding, and compassion so they can reach their full potential.
Economic development.
Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association of St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Walter's Walk. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Webster University ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds WALTER'S WALK ↗
- Who funds THE WYMAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds PREVENTED ↗
- Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds Village ↗
- Who funds Refuge and Restoration ↗
- Who funds KINGDOM HOUSE D/B/A LIFEWISE STL ↗
- Who funds ST LOUIS INTEGRATED HEALTH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds CHADS COALITION FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds St Louis Queer Support & Healing ↗
- Who funds FLANCE MANAGEMENT INC D/B/A FLANCE EARLY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds HAWTHORN LEADERSHIP SCHOOL FOR GIRLS ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds SAFE CONNECTIONS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Berges Family Foundation · Pott Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Bellwether Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chiron Community Giving Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Chiron Community Giving Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Chiron Community Giving Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.