How much did CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION reported 13 grants totaling $241,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION based?

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION is based in NC.

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION

Empowering families to stay together when faced with difficult life circumstances.

$241k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$40k

Largest

01What you fund

0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.

International$374kHuman Services$326kHealth$145kReligion$35kPhilanthropy$23kYouth Development$10kOther$200k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

it's

2020

refugeesgrievingbereavement

2021

refugeescharlottecollectivefoster care

2022

treatmenteducationservesexperiencingfoster care

2023

domestic violenceviolence sexualsexual assaultchild abusechildren'sendingprevention

2024

caregiverschild abusedomestic violenceviolence sexualsexual assaultchildren'srights

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$667k

Total assets

Largest grants

ADDIS JEMARI INC$40,000
KINDER-MOURN INC$30,000
FOSTER VILLAGE CHARLOTTE$25,000
MITCHELL BAYS TURNER PEDIATRIC FUND INC$20,000
THE STILL PLACE INC$20,000
COUNCIL FOR CHILDRENS RIGHTS INC$20,000
PROJECT 658 - HOPE COMMUNITY CLINIC$15,000
MIND BODY BABY$15,000
HOPEFUL HORIZONS$15,000
FOSTERING GREAT IDEAS RE-IMAGINE FOSTER CARE$11,000
THE PARENTING PATH$10,000
ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC$10,000
BEAUTY MARKS FOR GIRLS$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $168k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATIONlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.0M · 15 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.0M

$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%

+321%

Still filing today

100%

80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyReligionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AJ
ADDIS JEMARI INC
6× · 2019–2024 · $224k · revenue +153%
GO
GLIMMER OF HOPE FOUNDATION
5× · 2019–2023 · $150k · revenue +7%
KI
KINDER-MOURN INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +46%

Funded once

OI
OURBRIDGE INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +321%
RH
RENEWAL HOUSE INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +153%
FO
FRIENDS OF AINE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +579%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture

Carolina Adoption Services Inc

Carolina adoption services provides international and domestic adoption services, foster care, home studies, and post adoption supports for children, youth and adoptive families.

Human Services

Foster Kinship

Foster Kinship strengthens kinship caregivers' capacity to provide safe, stable and nurturing homes for children who can not live with their parents. By supporting the family, we reduce the trauma of parental separation and prevent…

Human Services

Americas Kids Belong

Americas Kids Belong works to dramatically improve the experiences and outcomes of kids in foster care so they can thrive in safe,loving families, supported by Foster Friendly communities where they belong.

Human Services

Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

To promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services

Foster Family Alliance of North Carolina

Educate, advocate, support and promote partnerships that lead to positive outcomes for childre, youth and resource families of NC.

Human Services

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Fostering Hope Inc

Provide facility, clothing and personal care items to numerous displaced children of Horry County. Create foster care awareness. Multiple organizations are visited monthly.

Human Services

The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children

The Childrens Room creates safe, supportive commuities so that no child, teen or family has to grieve alone.

Human Services

Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—

Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they can focus on fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports

The Whole Child - Mental Health &

We empower families towards healing, health, and homes.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Great Ideas and the most unlike its peers is A Glimmer of Hope Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/23

the rest of the field

13%

6,816/53,157

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

22/22

Grantees still filing

19/22

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

International$374,365Human Services$325,500Other$200,000Health$145,000Religion$35,000Philanthropy$23,135Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC19.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Albemarle Foundation · Km Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ADDIS JEMARI INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812624103 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ADDIS JEMARI INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Charlie's Heart Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charlie's Heart Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charlie's Heart Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CHARLIE'S HEART FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

22 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Charlie's Heart Foundation?

More from the funding graph