· Private foundation
Charles C Baum Foundation Inc Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENLIGHT FUND (BALTIMORE) | $26,523 |
| BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| ENOCH PRATT LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| THE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND | $7,500 |
| SHEPPARD PRATT | $5,000 |
| PRISON YOGA PROJECT | $3,000 |
| CASE AT DUKE UNIVERSITY | $3,000 |
| BALTIMORE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS | $2,000 |
| CENTER FOR HOPE (LIFEBRIDGE) BALTIMORE CHILD ABUSE | $2,000 |
| GIVE WELL | $1,500 |
| YMCA OF GREATER BOSTON | $1,250 |
| THREAD | $1,250 |
| THE VENETOULIS INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL JOURNALISM | $1,250 |
| BALITMORE HUNGER PROJECT | $1,250 |
| KEY SCHOOL | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND8× · 2017–2024 · $71k · revenue +36%
- EPENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue +37%
- SISHAREBABY INC2× · 2017–2022 · $8k · revenue +223%
Funded once
- BSBALTIMORE SCHOOL OF THE ARTSone grant, 2020 · $125k
- MNMENTOR NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIPone grant, 2017 · $20k
- TUTROY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ROSA PARKS MUSEUMone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nonprofit Finance Fund and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Mt Hope Cemetery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BALTIMORE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ENOCH PRATT FREE LIBRARY OF BALTIMORE CITY ↗
- Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SHAREBABY INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANIM INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Prison Yoga Project Inc ↗
- Who funds LA LUZ CENTER ↗
- Who funds SHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF CUMBERLAND MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC ↗
- Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THREAD INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND BALTIMORE ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MT HOPE CEMETERY ↗
- Who funds PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Stephen & Renee Bisciotti Foundation · Southway Builders Charitable Trust Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charles C Baum Foundation Inc Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
- Arundel Rivers Federation Inc — 19% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- The American Visionary Art Museum Inc — 6% of income from government
- Humanim Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sheppard Pratt Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charles C Baum Foundation Inc Inc?
Find your warmest path to Charles C Baum Foundation Inc Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.