Skip to content
Chandhok Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Chandhok Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$26kCrime & Legal$14kReligion$10kCivil Rights$6kInternational$4kArts & Culture$4kSocial Science$4kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$151k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Community Services Agency$3,000
California Social Labs$2,000
The Elizabeth Peabody House$1,000
Academic Games League of America$1,000
Presence in Community$1,000
Swigert International School$1,000
Community Help in Park Slope Inc$1,000
Lensic Performing Arts Center$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Elizabeth Peabody House: $2k → 8%Community Services Agency: $4k → 8%Humankind LA: $2k → 14%RIP Medical Debt: $1k → 9%RIP Medical Debt: $1k → 13%SUSU Community Farm: $200 → 11%Made in New Orleans Foundation: $1k → 23%Elizabeth Peabody House: $1k → 8%Community Services Agency: $4k → 8%RIP Medical Debt: $500 → 13%Community Help in Park Slope Inc: $1k → 20%Elizabeth Peabody House: $1k → 8%Community Services Agency: $3k → 8%RIP Medical Debt: $500 → 13%Community Help in Park Slope: $500 → 20%The Elizabeth Peabody House: $1k → 8%Community Services Agency: $3k → 8%Hour Children Inc: $750 → 13%Hour Children Inc: $250 → 13%Hour Children: $250 → 13%Harry Tompson Center: $500 → 23%Women's Medical Fund: $150 → 22%Women's Medical Fund: $150 → 22%Bluestockings Community Support Inc: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
NM
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 20 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
35

Total granted

$58k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

85%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalCivil RightsInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $14k · revenue +18%
  • AMISTAD LAW PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +60%
  • EP
    ELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $4k · revenue 0%
  • MV
    Mountain View Community Services Agency
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • TC
    Tides Center - Palestine Legal
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
2
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
3
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
4
The Audre Lorde Project Inc

The audre lorde project, inc. alp is a lesbian, gay, bisexual, two spirit, trans and gender non-conforming people of color community organizing center, focusing on the new york city area. through mobilization, education, and…

Health
5
New York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc

Nylpi's mission is to advance equality and civil rights, with a focus on health justice, disability rights and environmental justice, through the power of community lawyering and partnerships with the private bar.

—
6
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
7
Communities Resist Inc

We join our clients in the struggle to organize, assert their rights and protect their homes. we work to ensure that community voices are centered in the decisions that impact their lives and neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
8
Innocence Project New Orleans

Ipno frees innocent people sentenced to life in prison and those serving unjust sentences. we recognize the root causes of wrongful convictions and unjust sentences as systemic racism and inequities. we work to expose and address these…

Crime & Legal
9
Office of the Appellate Defender

Oad strives to ensure that poor people convicted of felonies receive full and equal access to justice by providing exceptional appellate representation, improving the quality of indigent defense representation through education & training,…

Crime & Legal
10
Legal Action Center of the City of New York Inc

The legal action center (lac) uses legal policy strategies to fight discrimination, build health equity, and restore opportunity for people with arrest and conviction records, substance use disorders, and hiv or aids.

Crime & Legal
11
Immigration Equality

Immigration equality promotes justice and equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and hiv-positive immigrants through direct legal services, policy advocacy, and impact litigation.

Civil Rights
12
Brooklyn Community Pride Center Inc

Brooklyn community pride center uplifts and empowers lgbtq+ brooklynites through socially conscious and culturally responsive programs, partnerships and advocacy.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Operation Restoration; the most unlike its peers is Project Prosper. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $13,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNT…ELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · Human ServicesELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE ASSOCIATIO…MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INCHumankind LA: $1,500 · Human ServicesHumankind LACOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INCHOUR CHILDREN INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesMADE IN NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Human Services+5 more: $1,750 · Human Services+5 moreUPAYA ZEN CENTER INC: $9,000 · OtherUPAYA ZEN CENTER INCMountain View Community Services Agency: $3,000 · OtherMountain View Community Services AgencyTides Center - Palestine Legal: $2,500 · OtherTides Center - Palestine LegalColorado Coalition for the Homeless: $1,300 · OtherNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $3,500 · OtherNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INCSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $1,500 · Other+24 more: $14,650 · Other+24 moreAMISTAD LAW PROJECT: $5,900 · Crime & LegalAMISTAD LA…BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $1,500 · Crime & LegalBROOKLYN C…Sylvia Rivera Law Project Inc: $750 · Crime & LegalSylvia Riv…THE BAIL PROJECT INC: $500 · Crime & LegalTHE BAIL P…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 · InternationalBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES: $2,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $1,500 · Civil RightsPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $1,300 · Civil RightsCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $300 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA SOCIAL LABS: $4,000 · EducationACADEMIC GAMES LEAGUES OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 · EducationNEW ORLEANS JAZZ & HERITAGE FESTIVAL AND FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 · Arts & CultureKREWE OF RED BEANS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $500 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $120 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$28,000Other$35,450Crime & Legal$8,650International$6,000Civil Rights$5,100Education$5,000Arts & Culture$3,720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $13,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMISTAD LAW PROJECT: $5,900 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetELIZABETH PEABODY HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SOCIAL LABS: $4,000 over 2y, 100% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN DEFENDER SERVICES: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JAZZ & HERITAGE FESTIVAL AND FOUNDATION INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY JUSTICE INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOUR CHILDREN INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGING WOMAN INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetACADEMIC GAMES LEAGUES OF AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADE IN NEW ORLEANS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKREWE OF RED BEANS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESENCE IN COMMUNITY: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLAST HOPE K9 RESCUE LTD: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF HAITIAN MIDWIVES INC: $950 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSylvia Rivera Law Project Inc: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION RESTORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY TOMPSON CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT PROSPER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQTX Equality Texas dba Equality Texas: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA: $300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRoots of Music Inc: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

ImpactassetsincTides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Rockefeller Philanthr…Silicon Valley Commun…Groundswell FundBorealis PhilanthropyThe Ford FoundationNEO Philanthropy IncThe Greater New Orlea…Tikkun Olam Foundatio…Leslie Fund Inc
ImpactassetsincMD19.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Groundswell Fund · Borealis Philanthropy · The Ford Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Tikkun Olam Foundation Inc · Leslie Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chandhok Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chandhok Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Susu Community Farm Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chandhok’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home