Skip to content

California · Public charity

Center for Plant Conservation Inc

Safeguard and conserve imperiled native plants by advancing science-based practices, connecting and empowering plant conservationists, and inspiring people to protect biodiversity for future generations.

$645k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
27
Itemized grants FY2025
23
Organizations funded FY2024
17%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2025
$534k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2025
$11,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$73,486
Organizations funded a year
10 to 23
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
15
Total assets, FY2025
$12M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations Center for Plant Conservation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 21% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving27$534k22%
FY202423$359k17%
FY202323$305k26%
FY202223$445k26%
FY202115$184k7%
FY202010$95k0%
FY201916$180k25%
FY201816$180k19%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$1.3MFood & Nutrition$274kEducation$163kAnimals$88kArts & Culture$64kPublic Benefit$13k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
CO
NE
MO
AZ
NM
NC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 41 grantees
All grantees of Center for Plant Conservation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees$164,95090%
Bok Tower Gardens Inc$163,00091%
Transition Zone Horticultural Inst$160,30094%
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden$154,25371%
Portland State University Foundation$150,17590%
Zoological Society of San Diego$141,33560%
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc$136,76090%
North Carolina Botanical Garden Foundation$130,62591%
The Atlanta Botanical Garden Inc$118,57760%
Native Plant Trust Inc$104,90090%
Lyon Arboretum Association$72,000938%
The Holden Arboretum$67,50090%
Desert Botanical Garden Inc$51,31550%
Institute for Applied Ecology$51,05041%
Waimea Arboretum Foundation$49,5009n/a
Florida State University Research Foundation Inc$44,06530%
National Tropical Botanical Garden$43,00030%
University of Washington$41,0001n/a
The Mercer Society$38,60053%
Santa Barbara Botanic Garden$33,09040%
Chicago Horticultural Society$33,02520%
Denver Botanic Gardens Inc$28,50030%
Denver Botanic Gardens Endowment$27,26020%
University of Hawaii Foundation$23,80020%
The California Desert Land Conservancy$23,77411%
Quail Botanical Gardens Foundation$20,25410%
University of California Berkeley Foundation$18,32410%
California Native Plant Society$17,10020%
Ichauway Inc$15,00020%
The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc$14,00020%
University of Utah$12,0001n/a
University of Washington Foundation$10,00010%
Regents of the University of California$9,4501n/a
Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc$7,80011%
Brooklyn Botanic Garden Corporation$7,50010%
Uc Santa Cruz Foundation$7,50010%
New Mexico Biopark Society Inc$6,0001n/a
Omaha Botanical Center Inc$6,00010%
Naples Botanical Garden Inc$5,50010%
Hi'ipaka LLC$5,50010%
The Arnold Arboretum Committee Inc$5,5001n/a

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($214k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Center for Plant Conservation Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 35 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMissouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees: $164,950 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBok Tower Gardens Inc: $163,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetTransition Zone Horticultural Inst: $160,300 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetRancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden: $154,253 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetPortland State University Foundation: $150,175 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetZoological Society of San Diego: $141,335 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc: $136,760 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Carolina Botanical Garden Foundation: $130,625 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetThe Atlanta Botanical Garden Inc: $118,577 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNative Plant Trust Inc: $104,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetLyon Arboretum Association: $72,000 over 9y, 38% of budgetThe Holden Arboretum: $67,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDesert Botanical Garden Inc: $51,315 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Applied Ecology: $51,050 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetFlorida State University Research Foundation Inc: $44,065 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNational Tropical Botanical Garden: $43,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Mercer Society: $38,600 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetSanta Barbara Botanic Garden: $33,090 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Horticultural Society: $33,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Botanic Gardens Inc: $28,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDenver Botanic Gardens Endowment: $27,260 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUniversity of Hawaii Foundation: $23,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe California Desert Land Conservancy: $23,774 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetQuail Botanical Gardens Foundation: $20,254 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of California Berkeley Foundation: $18,324 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Native Plant Society: $17,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetIchauway Inc: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc: $7,800 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBrooklyn Botanic Garden Corporation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUc Santa Cruz Foundation: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOmaha Botanical Center Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNaples Botanical Garden Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHi'ipaka LLC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 35.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Nature ConservancyVA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Nature Conservancy · Ibm International Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Center for Plant Conservation Inc with peer funders

About Center for Plant Conservation Inc

How much does Center for Plant Conservation Inc give?
Center for Plant Conservation Inc reported 27 itemized grants totaling $533,862, out of $644,775 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 23 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Center for Plant Conservation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (69%), Food & Nutrition (14%), Education (8%).
Who are Center for Plant Conservation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees ($165k), Bok Tower Gardens Inc ($163k), Transition Zone Horticultural Inst ($160k).
Does Center for Plant Conservation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Center for Plant Conservation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Nature Conservancy, Ibm International Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Center for Plant Conservation Inc based?
Center for Plant Conservation Inc is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Center for Plant Conservation’s filings →

More from the funding graph