· Public charity
Center for Action and Contemplation
The CENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION introduces spiritual seekers to the transformative wisdom of the christian contemplative tradition and nurtures its emergence in service to the healing of our world.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 26 grants below total $849,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,737,311 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $887,811 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $225k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $550k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AYNI INSTITUTE | $200,000 |
| CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL IMAGINATION | $100,000 |
| THE SURGE NETWORK | $100,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR THE WORKING POOR | $100,000 |
| ILLUMAN | $50,000 |
| THRESHOLDS COMMUNITY-GLOBAL | $30,000 |
| THE HAPPY GIVERS | $30,000 |
| FRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK | $30,000 |
| COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC | $30,000 |
| SOLIDAIRE NETWORK | $20,000 |
| WISDOM AND MONEY | $15,000 |
| TRINITY HOUSE CATHOLIC WORKER | $15,000 |
| SOCIAL GOOD FUND | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY COOPERATIVE | $15,000 |
| EQUAL JUSTICE USA | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Center for Action and Contemplation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AIAYNI INSTITUTE INC6× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +173% · 41% of their budget
- CFCENTER FOR THE WORKING POOR4× · 2019–2024 · $288k · revenue +244% · 35% of their budget
- IILLUMAN5× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +189% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
- FPFRANCISCAN PROVINCE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE4× · 2017–2023 · $36k
- ECEPISCOPAL CITY MISSIONone grant, 2020 · $15k
- OIONELIFE INSTITUTE INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…
We promote reciprocity in the psychedelic community, and support the protection of sacred plants and cultural traditions. We advance psychedelic justice through curating critical conversations and uplifting the voices of women, queer…
CAFE is a faith based Non Profit community organization with the purpose of training and organizing low and moderate income families to shape public policy.
The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…
The Spirituality Network connects people with resources for spiritual growth and depth, regardless of faith tradition though education and training, spiritual direction.
Fellowship Southwest is an ecumenical regional network of Christians and partner ministries promoting compassion, justice and connection throughout the Southwest US. Our ministry includes a network of pastors serving migrants on both sides…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…
Our vision is a Moral Economy for California which includes structural campaigns that result in significant material improvements for the most vulnerable Californians: making affordable and dignified housing a human right, reducing the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Made for Pax Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AYNI INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR THE WORKING POOR ↗
- Who funds ILLUMAN ↗
- Who funds Wisdom & Money ↗
- Who funds Solidaire Network Inc ↗
- Who funds Center for Spiritual Imagination Inc ↗
- Who funds Happy Sonship ↗
- Who funds Thresholds Community ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR SPIRITUAL & PUBLIC LDRSHP ↗
- Who funds ST FELIX PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Community Cooperative dba Francesco Collaborative ↗
- Who funds RED LETTER CHRISTIANS ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE USA INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds SHALEM INSTITUTE FOR SPIRITUAL FORMATION ↗
- Who funds HENRI NOUWEN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE INTERFAITH INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAITH MATTERS NETWORK COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO INTERFAITH POWER AND LIGHT ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds ONELIFE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE ↗
- Who funds Jubilee Gift Galaxy Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds ONE ATTA TIME INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Champions of Love Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The Wilderness Society · Impactassetsinc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Action and Contemplation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.