Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

$902k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$800k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$235MHuman Services$12MReligion$6.4MInternational$338kArts & Culture$40kCommunity Improvement$20kEducation$15kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $838,282 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $902,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,718 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $250k+1 grant · $800k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$437M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE - CATHOLIC MINISTRIES$800,000
LJDR DAVIS FOUNDATION$15,000
UPLIFT HELP INTL INC$15,000
URSULINE SISTERS OF TILDONK INC$8,282
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC: $20k → 7%LATINA SISTERS SUPPORT INC: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$245M · 18 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
16

Total granted

$245M
$9.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+22%

Still filing today

83%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE OF SIENA MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $64M · revenue +2%
  • SC
    ST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP
    4× · 2017–2020 · $57M · revenue +25%
  • MM
    MERCY MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $52M · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $5.5M · revenue +22%
  • SF
    ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2020 · $3.5M · revenue +24%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE
    one grant, 2020 · $67k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chs Physician Partners Pc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Chs Services Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
3
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
4
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
5
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
6
Good Shepherd Hospice Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
7
Catholic Health System of Long Island

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
8
St Francis Research & Educational Corporation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
9
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
St Joseph's Medical Pc

We, st. joseph's medical and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's medical is a member of st. joseph's health and trinity health.

Health
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
St Joseph's Hospital Health Center

We, st. joseph's hospital health center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. st. joseph's hospital health center is a member of st.…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Seeds of Hope Tanzania Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%3%5–10yr20%33%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%19%20–35yr13%0%35–55yr16%76%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,726

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
20/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST CATHERINE OF SIENA MEDICAL CENTER — $63,904,767 · HealthST CATHERINE OF SIENA MEDICAL CENTERST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP — $57,425,370 · HealthST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORPMERCY MEDICAL CENTER — $51,773,971 · HealthMERCY MEDICAL CENTERWSNCHS NORTH INC — $47,118,572 · HealthWSNCHS NORTH INC+7 more — $14,628,215 · Health+7 moreMARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC — $12,000,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE-CATHOLIC MINISTRIES — $6,150,000 · Other+7 more — $248,843 · OtherUPLIFT HELP INTERNATIONAL INC — $145,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $80,000 · InternationalNOVA Hope for Haiti Inc — $50,000 · InternationalTAKE HEART INC — $40,000 · International+1 more — $10,000 · InternationalHELP DIOCESE OF KIKWIT ZAIRE — $107,500 · ReligionBUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION — $15,000 · ReligionSeeds of Hope Tanzania Inc — $10,000 · ReligionREGINA MATERNITY SERVICES CORPORATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesLATINA SISTERS SUPPORT INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesROADS OF SUCCESS — $40,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED MISSION OF GOODWILL INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementCOPTIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH — $15,000 · Education
Health$234,850,895Other$18,398,843International$325,000Religion$132,500Human Services$50,000Arts & Culture$40,000Community Improvement$20,000Education$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST CATHERINE OF SIENA MEDICAL CENTER — $63,904,767 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetST CHARLES HOSPITAL CORP — $57,425,370 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL CENTER — $51,773,971 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetWSNCHS NORTH INC — $47,118,572 over 4y, 12% of budgetMARYHAVEN CENTER OF HOPE INC — $12,000,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $5,540,579 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOUR LADY OF CONSOLATION GERIATRIC CARE CENTER — $5,309,695 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL — $3,471,834 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUPLIFT HELP INTERNATIONAL INC — $145,000 over 7y, 33% of budgetROTACARE INC — $142,500 over 6y, 24% of budgetHELP DIOCESE OF KIKWIT ZAIRE — $107,500 over 4y, 38% of budgetLJDR DAVIS FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 5y, 52% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE — $66,561 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNURSING SISTERS HOME CARE INC — $58,607 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOVA Hope for Haiti Inc — $50,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IN THE DIOCESE OF ROCKVILLE CENTRE — $42,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTAKE HEART INC — $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetROADS OF SUCCESS — $40,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetREGINA MATERNITY SERVICES CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED MISSION OF GOODWILL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetCOPTIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF NORTH — $15,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSeeds of Hope Tanzania Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetLATINA SISTERS SUPPORT INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetGLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNatl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY8.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Catholic Health System of Long Island funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines