Skip to content

· Public charity

Carolinas CARE Partnership

To seek justice through health and housing.

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$287k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$3.6MHealth$1.5MHuman Services$696kPublic Safety & Disaster$633k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $1,088,097, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,363,974 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,275,877 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k8 grants · $801k
  • $250k+1 grant · $287k
$95,655
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
House of Mercy$286,971
RAO Community Health$218,558
Hope Haven$106,467
Roof Above$100,000
Nsideout Excellence$95,655
McLeod Addictive Disease Center$83,733
Kintegra Health$73,500
Mecklenburg County Health Dep$63,213
Time Out Youth$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Nsideout Excellence: $96k → 15%Nsideout Excellence: $30k → 15%Nsideout Excellence: $26k → 15%Nsideout Excellence: $22k → 15%Nsideout Excellence: $14k → 15%Rowan Helping Ministries: $11k → 15%Nsideout Excellence: $9k → 15%RAO Community Health: $219k → 10%Rosedale Assistance & Opportu: $176k → 10%Rosedale Assistance & Opportu: $161k → 10%RAO Community Health: $156k → 10%Rosedale Assistance & Opportu: $149k → 10%RAO Community Health: $113k → 10%Rosedale Assistance & Opportu: $112k → 10%Crisis Assistance Ministry: $26k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 17 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
4

Total granted

$6.3M
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+90%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOUSE OF MERCY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +36% · 28% of their budget
  • ROOF ABOVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +439%
  • HH
    Hope Haven Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $519k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • QH
    QUALITY HOME CARE SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $52k · revenue +443%
  • Crisis Assistance Ministrygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +27%
  • RH
    ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIESgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Positive Health Care Inc

Mission is to provide housing, counseling and support services to hiv infected clients and their families wherein prudent decisions are made for their well being and their communities.

Health
2
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
3
Carolinas Care Partnership

To seek justice through health and housing.

Health
4
We Are One Recovery

We are one recovery provides safe, affirming, substance-free housing specifically for lgbtqia2s+ individuals in recovery from substance use disorder and or mental health.

Housing & Shelter
5
Helping Hands Outreach Ministries Inc

Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.

Housing & Shelter
6
Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

Health
7
Housing Options and Geriatric Association Resources Inc

To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…

Health
8
Responsibility House Inc

Supportive housing and substance use disorder treatment prorgrams serve the community by providing support and counseling to families and individuals who struggle with substance use disorders, homelessness, mental illness and/or hiv/aids.

Health
9
The Open Door Inc

The purpose of The Open Door is to provide supportive housing that improves the health of high risk, chronically homeless individuals living with HIV.

Human Services
10
Community Networks Inc

Providing services to the homeless, low income individuals, and hiv/aids infected and affected individuals

Housing & Shelter
11
House of Ruth Inc

House of ruth provides housing support services to individuals and families infected and affected by hiv and aids.

Health
12
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is House of Mercy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Time Out Youth Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOUSE OF MERCY INC: $1,239,062 · OtherHOUSE OF MERCY INCKintegra Health: $261,673 · OtherKintegra HealthMens Shelter of Charlotte Inc: $179,958 · OtherMens Shelter of Charlotte IncMECKLENBURG COUNTY: $174,482 · OtherMECKLENBURG COUNTYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $171,200 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY+3 more: $142,158 · Other+3 moreHope Haven Inc: $519,182 · HealthHope Haven IncMCLEOD CENTERS FOR WELLBEING: $499,291 · HealthMCLEOD CENTERS FOR WELLBEINGDUDLEY'S PLACE INC: $351,677 · HealthDUDLEY'S PLACE INCAffinity Health Center: $289,941 · HealthAffinity Health CenterPositive Wellness Alliance: $99,233 · HealthPositive Wellness Alliance+1 more: $15,550 · HealthRAO COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,085,714 · Human ServicesRAO COMMUNITY HEALTHNSIDEOUT EXCELLENCE: $197,239 · Human ServicesNSIDEOUT EXCELLENCE+2 more: $36,986 · Human ServicesROOF ABOVE INC: $1,032,827 · Arts & CultureROOF ABOVE INCTime Out Youth Inc: $135,974 · ReligionThe Havens Inc: $8,548 · Housing & Shelter
Other$2,168,533Health$1,774,874Human Services$1,319,939Arts & Culture$1,032,827Religion$135,974Housing & Shelter$8,548

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $1,239,062 over 9y, 28% of budgetRAO COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,085,714 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $1,032,827 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHope Haven Inc: $519,182 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetMCLEOD CENTERS FOR WELLBEING: $499,291 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDUDLEY'S PLACE INC: $351,677 over 4y, 14% of budgetAffinity Health Center: $289,941 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetNSIDEOUT EXCELLENCE: $197,239 over 6y, 75% of budgetMens Shelter of Charlotte Inc: $179,958 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTime Out Youth Inc: $135,974 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetPositive Wellness Alliance: $99,233 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetQUALITY HOME CARE SERVICES INC: $51,772 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry: $26,486 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc: $22,080 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES: $10,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Havens Inc: $8,548 over 1y, 4.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds RAO COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds MCLEOD CENTERS FOR WELLBEING ↗
  • Who funds DUDLEY'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Affinity Health Center ↗
  • Who funds NSIDEOUT EXCELLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Mens Shelter of Charlotte Inc ↗
  • Who funds Time Out Youth Inc ↗
  • Who funds Positive Wellness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds QUALITY HOME CARE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds Community Link Programs of Travelers Aid Society of Central Carolinas Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE RECOVERY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds The Havens Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Merancas Foundation Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · True Homes Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carolinas CARE Partnership funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carolinas CARE Partnership. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carolinas CARE Partnership?

    Find your warmest path to Carolinas CARE Partnership through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carolinas CARE Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph