· Private foundation
Carl B & Florence E King Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 90 grants below total $2,955,965 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,744,365 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $788,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k63 grants · $1.7M
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| The Stewpot of First Presbyterian Church | $150,000 |
| TexProtects AKA Prevent Child Abuse | $150,000 |
| TRAC aka Transition Resource Action Center | $140,000 |
| Dallas Eviction Advocacy Center | $100,000 |
| Fort Worth Housing Solutions | $100,000 |
| United Way of Tarrant County | $100,000 |
| West Texas Food Bank | $75,000 |
| Communities Unlimited | $65,000 |
| John Brown University | $60,000 |
| Harmony Home Children's Advocacy Center | $55,000 |
| Basin Dream Center for Orphans | $50,000 |
| Presbyterian Night Shelter | $50,000 |
| Phoenix Youth and Family Services, Inc. | $50,000 |
| Recovery Resource Council | $50,000 |
| Texarkana Regional Arts and Humanities Council | $40,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 74 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JBJOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2024 · $120k · revenue +18%
- RRRecovery Resource Council2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +25%
- AFASSET FUNDERS NETWORK2× · 2023–2024 · $60k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- DCDevelopment Corporation of Snyderone grant, 2023 · $150k
- SCSCHLEICHER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +377% · 42% of their budget
- BCBAFB Cold War Museum, Inc.one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The children's advocacy center of van zandt county is committed to ensuring quality services and support to those children impacted by abuse while also building a future where no child in van zandt county experiences abuse.
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
To unify services across Dallas County, to empower youth, strengthen families and build safe, healthy communities.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council and the most unlike its peers is Alex Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
133 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 133 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARKANSAS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Nonprofit Management Center of the Permian Basin Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds DALLAS EVICTION ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SCHLEICHER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds ASSET FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds HARMONY HOME CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BAFB Cold War Museum, Inc. ↗
- Who funds PERMIAN BASIN REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds BASIN DREAM CENTER FOR ORPHANS ↗
- Who funds LIFT LITERACY INSTRUCTION FOR TEXAS DBA ASPIRE ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NPOWER INC ↗
- Who funds KID NET FOUNDATION JONATHANS PLACE ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
- Who funds CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds ODESSA CHRISTMAS IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEXARKANA REGIONAL ARTS & HUMANIT ↗
- Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ken W Davis Foundation · Abell-Hanger Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Women's Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Fmh Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Carl B & Florence E King Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Carl B & Florence E King Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.