Skip to content

· Private foundation

Carl Andre and Melissa L Kretschmer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$181kHealth$31kRecreation & Sports$28kEnvironment$23kEducation$15kAnimals$13kReligion$11kCivil Rights$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER$15,000
JUDD FOUNDATION$15,000
DIA ART FOUNDATION$15,000
CHINATI FOUNDATION$15,000
ADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART$15,000
THE LITTLE OPERA THEATER OF NY$5,000
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$4,500
MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$4,000
SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM$4,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER & BLOOD FOUNDATION$3,000
PACIFICA FOUNDATION WBA RADIO$3,000
BROOKLYN MUSEUM$3,000
NY PUBLIC LIBRARY$3,000
DRAWING CENTER$3,000
BROOKLYN RAIL$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER: $15k → 17%ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 26 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
1

Total granted

$271k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+11%

Still filing today

69%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +150%
  • JF
    JUDD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue +109%
  • TN
    The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations
    7× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • CF
    Climate Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
6
Amigos Del Museo Del Barrio Inc El Museo Del Barrio

El museo's mission is to preserve, interpret, and promote the artistic heritage of puerto ricans and all latin americans in the united states by means of exhibitions, public programs, publications, and educational activities.

Arts & Culture
7
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Berggruen Institute
Education
10
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
11
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
12
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations; the most unlike its peers is Save a Pet Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $23,000 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INCJUDD FOUNDATION: $18,000 · Arts & CultureJUDD FOUNDATIONTHE CHINATI FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHINATI FOUNDATIONPRIMARY INFORMATION INC: $11,000 · Arts & CulturePRIMARY INFORMATION INCPRINTED MATTER INC: $11,000 · Arts & CulturePRINTED MATTER INCTHE DRAWING CENTER INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DRAWING CENTER INCTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCESNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $9,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIOTHE LITTLE OPERA THEATER OF NY INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LITTLE OPERA THEATER OF NY INCTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $15,500 · Arts & Culture+4 moreADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ART: $24,000 · OtherADDISON GALLERY OF AMERICAN ARTNY BOTANICAL GARDEN: $11,000 · OtherNY BOTANICAL GARDENPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODJUDSON MEMORIAL CHURCH INC: $8,000 · OtherJUDSON MEMORIAL CHURCH INCMISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $6,040 · OtherMISC ORGANIZED CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC+12 more: $34,000 · Other+12 morePROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $12,000 · EducationANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $7,000 · EducationISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $11,000 · EnvironmentSAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 · Animals
Arts & Culture$137,500Other$109,040Recreation & Sports$22,000Education$19,000Human Services$18,000Environment$11,000Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $23,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDD FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPRIMARY INFORMATION INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPRINTED MATTER INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LITTLE OPERA THEATER OF NY INC: $8,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES: $7,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYARTS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK OPEN WATER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetClimate Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISABELLA GERIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JUDD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHINATI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds PRIMARY INFORMATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINTED MATTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DRAWING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLE OPERA THEATER OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK OPEN WATER INC ↗
  • Who funds Climate Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cowles Charitable TrustNY17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cowles Charitable Trust · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Kraus Family Foundation · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Arison Arts Foundation · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Carl Andre and Melissa L Kretschmer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Carl Andre and Melissa L Kretschmer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Carl Andre and Melissa L Kretschmer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph