Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Campbell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

85% of Campbell Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year Campbell Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $65k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

13
17
8
19
8
20
9
21
2
22
7
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$150kEducation$139kHuman Services$101kRecreation & Sports$35kReligion$33kInternational$8kHousing & Shelter$7kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$252k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HORIZONS$20,000
LA SALLE COLLEGE PREPARATORY$12,478
ROSE BOWL LEGACY FOUNDATION$7,000
DOLORES MISSION SCHOOL$6,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGO$4,900
HIGER GROUND MINISTRIES$4,000
AFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
DOLORES MISSION SCHOOL$1,000
HILLSIDE SCHOOL AND LEARNING$1,000
CRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL$1,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDREN HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$317k · 18 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
18

Total granted

$317k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+43%

Still filing today

39%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +134%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +36%
  • CP
    CRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +163%

Funded once

  • TP
    TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FP
    FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +42%
  • HG
    HIGHER GROUND LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
4
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
The Scripps Research Institute

The scripps research institute ("tsri") performs high impact basic biomedical research, improves the human condition by fostering translation of its discoveries into useful products and engages in the highest quality graduate scientific…

Health
7
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Variety Boys & Girls Club and the most unlike its peers is Nextstep Fitness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%6%20–35yr11%43%35–55yr13%40%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,955

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW HORIZONS — $100,513 · OtherNEW HORIZONSDOLORES MISSION SCHOOL — $42,700 · OtherDOLORES MISSION SCHOOLLA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL OF PASADENA INC — $35,956 · OtherLA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL OF PASADENA INCLA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL — $21,900 · OtherLA SALLE HIGH SCHOOLTRINITY PRSBYTERIAN CHURCH — $21,000 · OtherTRINITY PRSBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $15,701 · Other+26 more — $57,473 · Other+26 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $116,587 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHAR…Legacy Connections — $29,000 · Recreation & SportsHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $11,000 · EducationCRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $5,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $4,500 · EducationHILLSIDE SCHOOL AND LEARNING CENTER — $3,000 · EducationAFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US — $3,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS — $17,900 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE — $8,000 · ReligionWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,500 · Human Services
Other$295,243Community Improvement$116,587Recreation & Sports$33,000Education$31,500Philanthropy$17,900Religion$8,000Human Services$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $116,587 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLegacy Connections — $29,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS — $17,900 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC — $4,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSIDE SCHOOL AND LEARNING CENTER — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEXTSTEP FITNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC — $523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds Legacy Connections
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VERDUGOS
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds CRESTVIEW PREPARATORY SCHOOL
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds FLINTRIDGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC
  • Who funds HILLSIDE SCHOOL AND LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds AFRICAN CONSERVATION CENTRE US
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
  • Who funds NEXTSTEP FITNESS INC
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA17.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · Western Asset Management Company Charitable Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Campbell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Campbell Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Campbell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph