Skip to content

· Public charity

Camp Louemma Inc

CAMP LOUEMMA INC provides yearly scholarship funding for children, jewish or seeking jewish cultural identity, with social, physical, financial or emotional needs, to attend summer camp or similar organizations.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$369kRecreation & Sports$140kYouth Development$100k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP JUDAEA$20,000
CAMP BEBER$20,000
CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA$20,000
PERLMAN CAMP$20,000
CAMP ZEKE$20,000
SABABA BEACH CAMPS$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HERZL CAMP: $20k → 11%CAMP ZEKE: $20k → 13%PERLMAN CAMP: $20k → 6%CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA: $20k → 9%CAMP ZEKE: $20k → 9%SABABA BEACH CAMPS: $20k → 13%YOUNG JUDAEA CAMP: $20k → 17%CAMP BEBER: $20k → 5%CAMP LAURELWOOD: $20k → 12%CAMP JUDAEA: $20k → 12%PATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL BSA: $10k → 4%CAMP TIOGA: $10k → 7%Perlman Camp: $20k → 8%CAMPS AIRY & LOUISE: $20k → 19%Camp Zeke: $20k → 9%Sababa Beach Camps: $20k → 13%Young Judaea Camp Sprout Lakes: $20k → 17%CAMP BEBER: $20k → 5%Camp Laurelwood: $20k → 12%FAMILY CAMP GROUP LLC: $10k → 7%PERLMAN CAMP: $20k → 8%CAMP ZEKE: $20k → 9%SABABA BEACH CAMPS: $20k → 13%CAMP YOUNG JUDEA: $20k → 17%CAMP LAURELWOOD: $20k → 12%THE FAMILY CAMP GROUP LLC: $10k → 7%PERLMAN CAMP: $20k → 8%CAMP ZEKE: $5k → 9%SABABA BEACH CAMPS: $20k → 13%CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA: $20k → 17%CAMP LAURELWOOD: $20k → 12%PERLMAN CAMP: $20k → 8%CAMP ZEKE: $5k → 9%YOUNG JUDEA CAMP: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
MD
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 6 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$519k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-8%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $120k · revenue +27%
  • YJ
    YOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $110k · revenue +28%
  • CW
    CZ WELLNESS GROUP INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $90k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -17%
  • HC
    HERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • PP
    PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gan Israel Chabad Inc

Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education

Recreation & Sports
2
Camp Solomon Schechter

Camp Solomon Schechter blends Jewish tradition and culture as the foundation of the camp experience; integrates nature and activity to create fun; and embraces the child in every person to foster joy, facilitate friendship, and create…

Recreation & Sports
3
Jewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation

Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to themno matter who they are or where they come from.

Recreation & Sports
4
Camp Young Judaea Inc

To promote religious, educational, charitable activities and to provide the facilities for the same.

Recreation & Sports
5
Camp Bauercrest Inc

To develop and strengthen our campers both on and off the field through sportsmanship, teamwork, achievement and responsibility.

—
6
Camp Chaverim Inc Dba Reyus

The corporation operates a summer sleep away camp providing campers the opportunity to interact with values of judaism in daily life. the corporation converted from for-profit status to nonprofit status to better carry out charitable and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Camp Young Judaea Midwest Inc

Camp young judaea midwest, inspires jewish children of diverse backgrounds to thrive in a joyful, tight-knit community that is passionate about israel and judaism.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Foundation for Sephardic Camp

Religious overnight summer camp that focuses on the cultivation and preservation of sephardic jewish identity through an immersive camping experience

Religion
9
Camp Hadar Inc

Provide all campers of all faiths with a fun, safe and rewarding camping experience in a jewish cultural environment with emphasis placed on personal growth, friendship, and fun.

Recreation & Sports
10
Surprise Lake Camp

The mission of surprise lake camp is to provide a high quality jewish experience for children and young adults that is safe, fun and promotes personal growth. through our summer camp and year round programs, we promote jewish identity…

—
11
Camp Avoda Inc

Committed to providing jewish boys with a safe, vibrant and nurturing summer environment where "friendships are built to last a lifetime". we foster values of teamwork, leadership, self-confidence and respect for one another based on…

Recreation & Sports
12
Camp Degel Hatorah Inc

Provides a summer program for jewish boys of high school age. the mission is to continue the camper's religious studies in a relaxed setting while providing recreational opportunities.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Judaea Sprout Lake Camp Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sababa Surf Camp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $120,000 · Recreation & SportsBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INCCAMP LAURELWOOD INC: $80,400 · Recreation & SportsCAMP LAURELWOOD INCTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC: $20,077 · Recreation & SportsTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INCHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INCYOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP INC: $110,000 · OtherYOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP I…CAMP TIOGA: $38,500 · OtherCAMP TIOGAPERLMAN CAMP ORGANIZATION: $20,000 · OtherPERLMAN CAMP ORGANIZATIONCZ WELLNESS GROUP INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentCZ WELLNESS GROUP …PATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPATRIOTS' PATH COU…Sababa Surf Camp Inc: $80,158 · ReligionSababa Surf Ca…Camp Judaea Inc: $20,000 · Education
Recreation & Sports$240,477Other$168,500Youth Development$100,000Religion$80,158Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG JUDAEA SPROUT LAKE CAMP INC: $110,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetCZ WELLNESS GROUP INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCAMP LAURELWOOD INC: $80,400 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSababa Surf Camp Inc: $80,158 over 4y, 31% of budgetTHE CAMP AIRY & CAMP LOUISE FOUNDATION INC: $20,077 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERZL CAMP ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCamp Judaea Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPATRIOTS' PATH COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Harold Grinspoon FoundationMA24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Camp Louemma Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Camp Louemma Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Camp Airy & Camp Louise Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Camp Louemma Inc?

Find your warmest path to Camp Louemma Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Camp Louemma’s filings →

More from the funding graph