Loading…
· Public charity
CAMP LOUEMMA INC
CAMP LOUEMMA INC provides yearly scholarship funding for children, jewish or seeking jewish cultural identity, with social, physical, financial or emotional needs, to attend summer camp or similar organizations.
$140k
Granted FY2024
7
Grants
5
Communities
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Recreation & Sports$220kYouth Development$80kReligion$60kOther$129k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
good
2020
good
2021
growthleadership
2022
growthleadershipeducationalrecreationalgood
2023
growthleadershipeducationalrecreationalgood
2024
herzlyounggrowthleadershipindividualsafepositive
2025
environmentleadershipskillsgoodeducationalrecreational
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 7 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA$20,000
- PERLMAN CAMP$20,000
- CAMP ZEKE$20,000
- CAMP BEBER$20,000
- CAMP LAURELWOOD$20,000
- SABABA BEACH CAMPS$20,000
- HERZL CAMP$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 8%. 71% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$439k · 6 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else
6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
6
2
Total granted
$439k
$30k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+33%
+78%
Still filing today
67%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Recreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPerlman Camp4× · 2021–2024 · $100k · revenue +17%
- YJYoung Judaea Camp Sprout Lakes5× · 2019–2024 · $90k · revenue +38%
- CLCamp Laurelwood4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- CACAMPS AIRY & LOUISEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +78%
- PPPATRIOTS PATH COUNCIL BSAone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Camp Solomon Schechter
Camp for children and young adults in the Jewish community.
Recreation & Sports
2
Gan Israel Chabad Inc
Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education
Recreation & Sports
3
Camp Bauercrest Inc
Operation of a non-profit overnight summer camp installing jewish values to young boys who attend. we build jewish identity and self-esteem in young boys through promoting and teaching the values of sportsmanship, teamwork, achievement and…
—
4
Surprise Lake Camp
The mission of surprise lake camp is to provide a high quality jewish experience for children and young adults that is safe, fun and promotes personal growth.
—
5
Camp Avoda Inc
Committed to providing jewish boys with a safe, vibrant and nurturing summer environment where "friendships are built to last a lifetime". we foster values of teamwork, leadership, self-confidence and respect for one another based on…
Recreation & Sports
6
Camp Young Judaea Inc
To promote and provide facilities for religious, educational, & charitable activities.
Recreation & Sports
7
Young Judaea Camp Tel Yehudah Inc
Camp tel yehudah inspires jewish and zionist youth from around the world to experience and embrace the diversity of the jewish people in a joyful and diverse community while training them to become leaders who effect positive change for…
Recreation & Sports
8
Jewish Reconstructionist Camping
Incredibly diverse and welcoming communities where we encourage children to discover what being jewish means to them-no matter who they are or where they come from.
Recreation & Sports
9
Camp Kinder Ring
Summer camp for children that would provide opportunities to develop new skills and encourage participation in jewish life.
Arts & Culture
10
Camp Ramah in Northern California
Camp ramah in northern california engages the members of our camp community in joyful, transformative experiences that serve as a model for lifelong jewish learning and practice, commitment to klal yisrael (israel and the jewish…
Recreation & Sports
11
Camp Livingston Inc
Camp Livingston is a residential camp program for youth which shall enrich the lives of its campers and staff with a fun, unique, communal Jewish camping experience. We encourage the development of Jewish identity, enable the formation of…
Recreation & Sports
12
Camp Morasha Inc
Camp Morasha integrates the best in informal and formal education in all of its programming and activities through a transformative and fun, co-ed, summer experience for Jewish youth. The camp inspires and develops the minds, bodies,…
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Judaea Sprout and the most unlike its peers is Cz Wellness Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Recreation & Sports$220,477Other$128,500Youth Development$80,000Religion$60,158
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Foundation for Jewish Camp IncNY20.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CAMP LOUEMMA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- The Camp Airy & Camp Louise — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Sababa Beach Camps.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 814561235 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Sababa Beach Camps, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 31% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Camp Louemma Inc?
Find your warmest path to Camp Louemma Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines