· Community foundation
Cambridge Charitable Foundation
To promote philanthropy broadly throughout the greater cincinnati, ohio region while working to build and preserve permanent endowment funds for the support of arts and culture, community progress, education, the environment, health and human services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 80 grants below total $9,946,968 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,174,379 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $227,411 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $138k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $714k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+7 grants · $7.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MESIVTA OF CINCINNATI | $2,493,700 |
| OHR TORAH CINCINNATI | $2,090,160 |
| CINCINNATI COMMUNITY KOLLEL | $1,162,668 |
| KNESETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION | $787,505 |
| AGUDATH ACHIM OF CINCINNATI | $499,900 |
| CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL | $323,870 |
| CAMP ASHREINU OF CINCINNATI | $309,827 |
| NER ISRAEL RABBINICAL COLLEGE | $144,215 |
| CONGREGATION ZICHRON ELIEZER | $127,450 |
| LAWRENCE SCHOOL | $126,000 |
| AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA | $118,000 |
| WOLFTRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $100,000 |
| CONGREGATION YESHIVA YAD MOSHE | $100,000 |
| THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $100,000 |
| MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
119 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +44%
- JFJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS6× · 2017–2024 · $580k · revenue +28%
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES8× · 2017–2024 · $525k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- NLNER L HOREINU INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +45%
- CACONGREGATION AND YESHIVA BETH HILLELone grant, 2020 · $72k
- BMBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA OF LAKEWOOD INCone grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
To further jewish education in israel
Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.
To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.
Religious School
An institution for higher learning and study of talmudic law for post high school students, and students returning from their studies in israel, where they can further their education.
To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.
To maintain a school for hebrew religious and secular education
Establishment & conduct of religious school in the tradition of the Orthodox Jewish faith.
Furtherance of jewish education
Keren hayeshivot trust supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.
To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Beth Jacob Teachers Institute of Jerusalem. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CINCINNATI HEBREW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds WOLF TRAP FOUNDATION FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds Camp Ashreinu ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE ANCHOR FUND ↗
- Who funds TORAH COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAAS AHARON INC ↗
- Who funds Hillel Foundation at Miami University ↗
- Who funds Miami University Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF NAHAL HAREDI ↗
- Who funds Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life ↗
- Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc ↗
- Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education ↗
- Who funds TENDER MERCIES INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER CINCINNATI INC ↗
- Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Greater Cincinnati ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Ojc Fund · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cincinnati · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Center for Jewish Education Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cambridge Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc — 9% of income from government
- Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
- Push Movement — 8% of income from government
- Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jewels School Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mesorah Heritage Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cambridge Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cambridge Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.