· Private foundation
Cambia Health Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $280k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Cambia Health Solutions - Employee Giving | $892,563 |
| The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $253,500 |
| Jewish Family Service | $150,000 |
| University of Portland | $127,500 |
| Cascade AIDS Project | $113,000 |
| Cornerstone Whole Healthcare Organization | $60,000 |
| University of Utah | $60,000 |
| Oregon Latino Health Coalition | $60,000 |
| Wenatchee Valley College | $60,000 |
| Oregon Child & Family Services Council Inc | $60,000 |
| Greater New Hope Charities | $60,000 |
| Clark County Latino Youth DBA Latino Leadership NW | $60,000 |
| Whatcom Community College | $55,000 |
| Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake | $52,000 |
| Trillium Family Services Inc | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
33 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSeattle Children's Foundation3× · 2020–2022 · $1.3M · revenue +140%
- RMRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $575k · revenue +75%
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY2× · 2019–2020 · $270k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- FSFour Seasons Compassion for Lifeone grant, 2020 · $382k
- OOpenNotesone grant, 2019 · $350k
- BRBeckman Research Institute of City of Hopeone grant, 2018 · $277k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.
Healthpoint strengthens communities and improves people's health by delivering quality services, breaking down barriers and providing access to all.
The mission of the organization is to provide primary medical, dental, behavioral health, pharmacy and related support services to the residents of the Rhode Island communities that it serves regardless of ability to pay. The emphasis is…
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…
Hcao educates about and advocates for an equitable, affordable, comprehensive, high-quality publicly funded universal healthcare system that will improve the lives of individuals, families and communities across oregon and throughout the…
Advance health and social justice for all members of our community.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
To improve the health of the public.
Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborcare Health and the most unlike its peers is The Shades of Motherhood Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
117 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 117 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds ROSALYNN CARTER INSTITUTE FOR CAREGIVERS ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds END WELL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Association for Utah Community Health ↗
- Who funds VITAL TALK ↗
- Who funds OREGON PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHIERHERE ↗
- Who funds IDAHO PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Comunidades Unidas ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service ↗
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Meyer Memorial Trust · Careoregon Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cambia Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
- Oregon Child and Family Services Council Inc — 66% of income from government
- Coalition of Community Health Clinics — 46% of income from government
- Oregon Latino Health Coalition — 43% of income from government
- Oregon Washington Health Network — 42% of income from government
- Raices de Bienestar — 41% of income from government
- Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- Oregon Primary Care Association — 32% of income from government
- United Way of the Columbia-Willamette — 25% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- Brookings Community Resource Response — 17% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Northwest Human Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- North By Northeast Community Health Center — 4% of income from government
- Cascadia Health — 3% of income from government
- Trillium Family Services — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- University of Portland — 1% of income from government
- Northwest Housing Alternatives — 1% of income from government
- Southern Oregon University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- St Charles Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
- Seeding Justice — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cambia Health Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Cambia Health Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.