Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH

GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $255,000 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($75,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$31M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$255k
Net assets
$69M
1/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%
01What it does

What Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health does

Mission

The mission of the gcach is to advance the health of our population by decreasing health disparities, improving efficiency of health care delivery, and empowering individuals and communities through collaboration, innovation, and community engagement.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. The organization is designated an accountable community of health (ach) by the health care authority (hca). The state of washington's health care authority, the agency overseeing all nine statewide achs, has developed the following key functions of an ach; 1. Select and monitor medicaid demonstration transformation projects and ensure that the projects are successful. 2. Serve as the single point of accountability for transformation projects. 3. Be a defined legal entity in order to meet the requirements of the centers for medicare and medicaid services (cms). 4. Have a governance structure that is multi-sector, has balanced engagement between health care systems and social determinants, is transparent, and demonstrates effective decision making processes. 5. Demonstrate regional partnerships through letters of understanding guided by yearly contracts with the hca, achs were required to develop and implement a regional health improvment plan, and implement at least one regional health improvement project as a pilot project.

    $5,635,839 spentof which $3,767,277 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $5,635,839.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($541k) Expenses 100 ($80k) Net assets 100 ($461k)2018 Revenue 5610 ($30M) Expenses 7184 ($5.7M) Net assets 6659 ($31M)2019 Revenue 3494 ($19M) Expenses 23892 ($19M) Net assets 5466 ($25M)2020 Revenue 3049 ($16M) Expenses 20740 ($17M) Net assets 6591 ($30M)2021 Revenue 2323 ($13M) Expenses 15155 ($12M) Net assets 6701 ($31M)2022 Revenue 2601 ($14M) Expenses 7758 ($6.2M) Net assets 8413 ($39M)2023 Revenue 2336 ($13M) Expenses 6227 ($5.0M) Net assets 10077 ($46M)2024 Revenue 5645 ($31M) Expenses 9677 ($7.7M) Net assets 15028 ($69M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (5645)Expenses (9677)Net assets (15028)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $463k to $32M (+6818%).

$463k
$32M
$34M
$34M
$33M
$40M
$48M
$71M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 100% · 2018 99% · 2019 89% · 2020 94% · 2021 85% · 2022 86% · 2023 80% · 2024 92%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$461k
’17
$25M
’18
−$106k
’19
−$7k
’20
$507k
’21
$7.9M
’22
$7.7M
’23
$23M
’24
92
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Sharon Brown

Chief executive officer

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2021 and FY2022 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1722181818192120
Joined·+9+0+3+4+2+4+3
No longer listed·4434124
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $50k → $90k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 49% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $175k from one payer (the same organization on both sides, largest Greater Columbia Accountable Community of Health). These are real filings, and they are not money GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH raised.

From the IRS filings of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

84% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH.

29%
largest funder
69%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2021 56% · 2022 56% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

69% of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
OR

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $125k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $563k on record.

Federal$563k
grants $563kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$563k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 27%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH?
GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH (Washington) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $255,000 to it, the largest being YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($75,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $255,000 in grants to GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH?
YAKIMA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $75,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GREATER COLUMBIA ACCOUNTABLE COMMUNITY OF HEALTH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing