California · Nonprofit
California ReLeaf
California ReLeaf (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,117 to it, the largest being GRACE JONES RICHARDSON TESTAMENTARY TRUST C/O PIEDMONT TRUST CO ($12,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2025
- $764k
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $14k
- Net assets
- $660k
What California ReLeaf does
Mission
California Releaf's mission is to empower grassroots efforts and build strategic partnerships that preserve, protect and enhance California's urban and community forests.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Program Grant ManagementIn fiscal year 2025, Edison International generously supported California ReLeafs California Arbor Week Program. Their sponsorship supported 9 pass-through community grants totaling $45,000 to honor, celebrate, and plant trees from Porterville, Goleta, Ventura and Moorpark northwest of LA then heading east to Monrovia , Claremont, and San Bernardino with two grantees farther south in Fullerton. The program aligns with Edisons goal to reduce the impacts of climate change and extreme heat by supporting new and smaller community groups to plant trees for shade and cooler neighborhoods.Pacific Gas & Electric continued their support of the Growing Greener Communities program which focused on reducing extreme heat in underserved communities within PG&Es seven regions. In FY2025 ReLeaf managed 13 Growing Green Communities grants totaling $65,000, which served communities from San Francisco and Sacramento to Atascadero and Bakersfield.Also in fiscal year 2025, California ReLeaf successfully closed the California Prop 68 funded Relief Through ReLeaf grant program, using the remaining funds to extend the ReLeaf Tree Inventory program to track and better maintain all…
$295,114 spentof which $160,440 as grants55% of program spendingEducation and OutreachThis program strengthens grassroots efforts by engaging the general public, community leaders, interested organizations, and urban and community forestry professionals. California ReLeafs programs are designed to educate Californians about the value and benefits of trees as well as sound tree care practices.FY2025 Education & Outreach Accomplishments:Urban Forest Leadership Training Launched in early 2022 with a CAL FIRE grant and USDA Forest Service support, the Urban Forest Leadership program met monthly via Zoom to develop talent, collegial support, and professional capacity in the next generation of urban forest leaders. Katie McCleary of Paper Wings Creative Consulting ? a nonprofit leadership expert and author of Bridge the Gap, a book about collaborative and effective communications? ? facilitated the class sessions based on a custom agenda developed by Katie and California ReLeaf. As intended from the beginning, the grant program was able to provide stipends to class participants who attended the class on their own time, which were distributed in mid FY2025. For background information on this successfully concluded program, please visit:…
$140,825 spent26% of program spendingCalifornia ReLeaf Network:The California ReLeaf Network is a statewide forum for the informational exchange, education, and mutual support of community-based organizations. The members have common goals of community development by planting and protecting trees, promoting community engagement and volunteer involvement, and fostering an ethic of environmental stewardship.The ReLeaf Network enables individual groups to use their collective power to improve the urban and community forests in their home towns for all Californians. Through membership in the Network, groups build their organizational and technical skills, share their enthusiasm, experiences and ideas, address issues of common concern, and work together to plant trees, promote tree care and community stewardship, and grow stronger communities throughout the state.2024/25 Accomplishments of this program include: The Network includes over 80 members that vary from small groups of dedicated volunteers to larger nonprofit organizations with paid staff. Network members represent diverse demographics and a broad geographic reach throughout California. Network member organizations: - Planted 34,000+ trees - Cared for 155,000+…
$104,441 spent19% of program spendingLegislative Monitoring and Outreach:California ReLeaf monitors State and Federal legislation for opportunities to educate and participate in public debate and policy related to urban forestry. Of particular interest is how urban forestry is being increasingly integrated into other policy and funding arenas, such as affordable housing, additional mitigation measures, and potentially climate adaptation programs. It is gratifying to see the steadily mounting recognition of the value of urban forest co-benefits combined with the need to ensure environmental justice through prioritizing state and federal funding in previously underserved communities as demonstrated by the California Climate Investments program and the Federal Justice40 Initiative.Through our website, newsletter, emails and action alerts, ReLeaf ensures that Network members and other interested community members are aware of what is happening at the state and federal level and also provides information for how local groups can make their voices heard.Strategic Partnerships:In order to advance California ReLeafs mission to empower grassroots efforts and build strategic partnerships that preserve, protect, and enhance…
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $540,380.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $522k to $1.3M (+148%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 88% · 2018 90% · 2019 89% · 2020 93% · 2021 86% · 2022 87% · 2023 87% · 2024 84% · 2025 64%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
98% of California ReLeaf’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $250 → $2k.
1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
Left out of every figure on this page: $156k from one payer (the same organization on both sides, largest California ReLeaf). These are real filings, and they are not money California ReLeaf raised.
From the IRS filings of California ReLeaf’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
California ReLeaf leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 78% · 2021 94% · 2022 65% · 2023 96% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
California ReLeaf draws 98% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $367 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
California ReLeaf's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Government funding California ReLeaf receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.5M on record.
- Department of Agriculture$2.5M
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like California ReLeaf
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
74% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for California ReLeaf: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds California ReLeaf?
- California ReLeaf (California) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,117 to it, the largest being GRACE JONES RICHARDSON TESTAMENTARY TRUST C/O PIEDMONT TRUST CO ($12,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does California ReLeaf have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $14,117 in grants to California ReLeaf, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of California ReLeaf?
- GRACE JONES RICHARDSON TESTAMENTARY TRUST C/O PIEDMONT TRUST CO is the largest funder on record, with $12,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like California ReLeaf find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing