Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Butte Environmental Council

Butte Environmental Council (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $187,630 to it, the largest being California ReLeaf ($113,549). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$292k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$188k
Net assets
$186k
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 33%
01What it does

What Butte Environmental Council does

Mission

Butte Environmental Council's Mission is to protect and defend the land, air, and water of Butte County and the surrounding region through action, advocacy, and education.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. OCPSC: As a Trusted Messenger for the State of California, BEC conducted targeted outreach for statewide campaigns, reaching over 3,744 community members across Glenn, Butte, and Tehama Counties. BEC successfully completed this grant in June 2025.

    $129,376 spentof which $149,958 as grants
    63% of program spending
  2. ReLeaf Treecovery: With support from the Treecovery program, BEC successfully planted 180 15-gallon shade trees across more than 15 parks, schools, and shared community spaces. Over 500 community volunteers and schoolchildren participated in educational sessions and hands-on tree planting events. Trees were thoughtfully placed in three counties, focusing on areas within disadvantaged and low-income communities identified as lacking shade. This initiative expanded local tree canopies, benefiting not only children and community members but also the surrounding plant and animal species that rely on healthy urban forests.

    $13,649 spentof which $18,245 as grants
    7% of program spending
  3. Trees PLEASE (Planting Literacy in Environmental Action and Stewardship Education) is a tree planting program that aims to increase the urban canopy in Butte County and the surrounding region by planting shade trees on school campuses, in parks and community shared spaces. This program has planted a total of 273 shade trees with the final goal of 330 shade trees by the end of 2026. This program also aims to educate students and community members about the importance of trees, carbon sequestration, proper tree planting technique and tree care.

    $10,284 spentof which $11,164 as grants
    5% of program spending
  4. Neighbor-to-Neighbor

    $8,821 spentof which $9,281 as grants
    4% of program spending
  5. Gardens

    $8,181 spent$9,983 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  6. Drop in the Bucket

    $6,859 spent$8,743 earned by the program
    3% of program spending
  7. Rare

    $6,396 spentof which $5,120 as grants
    3% of program spending
  8. Education & Outreach

    $5,093 spent$6,808 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  9. Endangered Earth Event

    $4,518 spent$5,294 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  10. Park and Creek clean up

    $4,414 spent$5,140 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  11. Other MISC programs

    $3,739 spentof which $3,000 as grants
    2% of program spending
  12. Creek Watch

    $1,799 spentof which $2,034 as grants
    1% of program spending
  13. CV Infrastructure

    $1,242 spentof which $1,661 as grants
    1% of program spending

The 13 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $204,371.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($147k) Expenses 100 ($145k) Net assets 100 ($22k)2022 Revenue 138 ($203k) Expenses 125 ($182k) Net assets 193 ($43k)2023 Revenue 150 ($221k) Expenses 162 ($236k) Net assets 123 ($27k)2024 Revenue 205 ($300k) Expenses 155 ($225k) Net assets 531 ($118k)2025 Revenue 199 ($292k) Expenses 154 ($224k) Net assets 838 ($186k)
20212022202320242025
Revenue (199)Expenses (154)Net assets (838)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $27k to $128k (+373%).

$28k
$46k
$27k
$128k
$182k
20212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 0% · 2022 41% · 2023 25% · 2024 48% · 2025 54%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

91% of Butte Environmental Council’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$1k
’21
$21k
’22
−$15k
’23
$75k
’24
$68k
’25
8.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20212022202320242025
Listed1110889
Joined·+1+0+7+3
No longer listed·2272
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $10k → $73k.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
California ReLeafunclassified
$114k
funders
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Butte Environmental Council’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Butte Environmental Council leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Butte Environmental Council.

61%
largest funder
86%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 95% · 2018 98% · 2020 91% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 92% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

86% of Butte Environmental Council's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
CO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’20
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $26k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Butte Environmental Council runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin23% · above the median
Months of reserve8.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Butte Environmental Council

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

91% of spending goes to programs.

Program 91%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Butte Environmental Council: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Butte Environmental Council?
Butte Environmental Council (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $187,630 to it, the largest being California ReLeaf ($113,549). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Butte Environmental Council have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $187,630 in grants to Butte Environmental Council, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Butte Environmental Council?
California ReLeaf is the largest funder on record, with $113,549 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Butte Environmental Council find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Butte Environmental Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2021–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing