Skip to content
California Coverage & Health Initiatives at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

California Coverage & Health Initiatives

Cchi's mission is to improve the health and well-being of california children and families by supporting its members in meeting the needs of thier communities.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$18MCrime & Legal$3.0MHuman Services$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.4MEducation$1.1MPhilanthropy$849kCivil Rights$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.3M
$153,662
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVES$1,654,799
HIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$725,524
LEGAL AID SOCY OF SAN DIEGO$639,428
CHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE$342,488
CCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTY$323,478
Individual grant recipient$312,758
KERN COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN S$263,478
HEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION$177,845
ALIADOS HEALTH$156,708
COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$153,662
ALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM$141,766
YOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS' ALLIAN$131,229
SAN MATEO C HEALTH COVERAGE U$103,846
REDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTERS$80,548
GIVE FOR A SMILE$64,820
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Give for a Smile: $84k → 10%El Concilio: $29k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $72k → 10%EL CONCILIO: $23k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $65k → 10%EL CONCILIO: $19k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $52k → 10%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $48k → 10%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $26k → 10%Give for a Smile: $17k → 10%Give for a Smile: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 29 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$26M
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+48%

Still filing today

66%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +8% · 59% of their budget
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +45%
  • CH
    Community Health Partnership Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • IW
    INLAND WELLNESS INFORMATION NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $81k · revenue -71% · 36% of their budget
  • CH
    Central Health Access Asst
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
  • AMPLA HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +147%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
2
Californians to Protect Community Healthcare

To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy

—
3
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
4
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
5
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
6
Family Healthcare Network

To provide health care services to socially and economically distressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.

Health
7
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
8
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
9
California Chronic Care Coalition

To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care

Human Services
10
Connecting for Better Health

Connecting for Better Health brings together consumer groups, health care providers, health plans, and technology partners dedicated to advancing statewide health data exchange in California. The team members meet regularly as a coalition…

Health
11
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
12
Inland Behavioral & Health Services Inc

IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Concilio California; the most unlike its peers is Give for a Smile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $9,736,766 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INCHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,242,611 · HealthHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATIONSan Diegans for Health Care Coverage: $959,143 · HealthSan Diegans for Health Care CoverageALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $495,600 · HealthALIADOS HEALTH: $483,967 · Health+9 more: $929,513 · Health+9 moreLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $2,964,428 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGOCommunity Health Partnership Inc: $2,026,916 · OtherCommunity Health Partnership IncIndividual grant recipient: $962,251 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKern County Dept of Human S: $543,478 · OtherKern County Dept of Human SCCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTY: $543,478 · OtherCCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTYCOUNTY OF VENTURA-AUDITOR: $319,037 · Other+10 more: $1,058,458 · Other+10 moreStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc: $3,200,822 · PhilanthropyStreams in t…+2 more: $68,645 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE SERVICES: $1,720,198 · Human ServicesGive For A Smile: $379,759 · Human Services+1 more: $70,353 · Human ServicesVISION Y COMPROMISO: $1,077,434 · EducationYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $507,072 · Crime & LegalASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $27,628 · Crime & LegalBUILD REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC: $8,000 · Employment
Health$13,847,600Other$8,418,046Philanthropy$3,269,467Human Services$2,170,310Education$1,077,434Crime & Legal$534,700Employment$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $9,736,766 over 8y, 59% of budgetStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc: $3,200,822 over 6y, 68% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $2,964,428 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc: $2,026,916 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE SERVICES: $1,720,198 over 5y, 31% of budgetHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION: $1,242,611 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $1,077,434 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetSan Diegans for Health Care Coverage: $959,143 over 6y, 44% of budgetYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE: $507,072 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $495,600 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH: $483,967 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetGive For A Smile: $379,759 over 8y, 89% of budgetREDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $280,065 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $233,893 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY FOUNDATION BAKERSFIELD: $233,312 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC: $168,821 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetINLAND WELLNESS INFORMATION NETWORK: $80,981 over 1y, 36% of budgetEL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $70,353 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOLANO COALITION FOR BETTER HEALTH: $70,255 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks: $66,540 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMPLA HEALTH: $59,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHWAYS: $47,530 over 3y, 15% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $46,645 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFresno Healthy Communities Access Partners: $44,589 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH: $41,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $27,628 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN: $25,924 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION AND RESOURCE CENTER: $24,653 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Santa Cruz County: $22,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBUILD REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Endowm…Sunlight GivingEast Bay Community Fo…Sierra Health Foundat…Direct ReliefPublic Health Institu…The California Wellne…Sierra Health Foundat…California Physicians…California Community …California Healthcare…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA37× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · Sunlight Giving · East Bay Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Direct Relief · Public Health Institute · The California Wellness Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Community Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Coverage & Health Initiatives funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Coverage & Health Initiatives. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Coverage & Health Initiatives’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home