Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

California Coverage & Health Initiatives

Cchi's mission is to improve the health and well-being of california children and families by supporting its members in meeting the needs of thier communities.

$5.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$18MCrime & Legal$3.0MHuman Services$2.7MCommunity Improvement$2.4MEducation$1.1MPhilanthropy$849kCivil Rights$28kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+7 grants · $4.3M
$153,662
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVES$1,654,799
HIGH DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$725,524
LEGAL AID SOCY OF SAN DIEGO$639,428
CHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE$342,488
CCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTY$323,478
Individual grant recipient$312,758
KERN COUNTY DEPT OF HUMAN S$263,478
HEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION$177,845
ALIADOS HEALTH$156,708
COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$153,662
ALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM$141,766
YOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS' ALLIAN$131,229
SAN MATEO C HEALTH COVERAGE U$103,846
REDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTERS$80,548
GIVE FOR A SMILE$64,820
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Give for a Smile: $84k → 10%El Concilio: $29k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $72k → 10%EL CONCILIO: $23k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $65k → 10%EL CONCILIO: $19k → 12%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $52k → 10%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $48k → 10%GIVE FOR A SMILE: $26k → 10%Give for a Smile: $17k → 10%Give for a Smile: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 29 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
10

Total granted

$26M
$392k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+48%

Still filing today

66%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9.7M · revenue +8% · 59% of their budget
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +45%
  • CH
    Community Health Partnership Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • IW
    INLAND WELLNESS INFORMATION NETWORK
    one grant, 2017 · $81k · revenue -71% · 36% of their budget
  • CH
    Central Health Access Asst
    one grant, 2023 · $61k
  • AMPLA HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $60k · revenue +147%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
2
Californians to Protect Community Healthcare

To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy

—
3
Community Health Association Inland Southern Region

We exist to support our membership and community parnters to ensure acessible high-quality, and cost-effictve health services.

—
4
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
5
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
6
Family Healthcare Network

To provide health care services to socially and economically distressed sectors of the southern San Joaquin Valley in California.

Health
7
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
8
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
9
California Chronic Care Coalition

To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care

Human Services
10
Connecting for Better Health

Connecting for Better Health brings together consumer groups, health care providers, health plans, and technology partners dedicated to advancing statewide health data exchange in California. The team members meet regularly as a coalition…

Health
11
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
12
Inland Behavioral & Health Services Inc

IBHS is dedicated to helping the community achieve and maintain general good health, education and welfare through commitment in providing excellent service in the areas of physical health care, substance abuse treatment, mental health…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Concilio California and the most unlike its peers is Give for a Smile. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr12%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%74%20–35yr11%4%35–55yr12%13%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/34
the rest of the field
14%
19,386/133,976

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $9,736,766 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INCHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION — $1,242,611 · HealthHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATIONSan Diegans for Health Care Coverage — $959,143 · HealthSan Diegans for Health Care CoverageALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $495,600 · HealthALIADOS HEALTH — $483,967 · Health+9 more — $929,513 · Health+9 moreLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $2,964,428 · OtherLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGOCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $2,026,916 · OtherCommunity Health Partnership IncIndividual grant recipient — $962,251 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTY — $543,478 · OtherCCLINIC ASSOC OF LA COUNTYKern County Dept of Human S — $543,478 · OtherKern County Dept of Human SCOUNTY OF VENTURA-AUDITOR — $319,037 · Other+10 more — $1,058,458 · Other+10 moreStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc — $3,200,822 · PhilanthropyStreams in t…+2 more — $68,645 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE SERVICES — $1,720,198 · Human ServicesGive For A Smile — $379,759 · Human Services+1 more — $70,353 · Human ServicesVISION Y COMPROMISO — $1,077,434 · EducationYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE — $507,072 · Crime & LegalASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $27,628 · Crime & LegalBUILD REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC — $8,000 · Employment
Health$13,847,600Other$8,418,046Philanthropy$3,269,467Human Services$2,170,310Education$1,077,434Crime & Legal$534,700Employment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $9,736,766 over 8y, 59% of budgetStreams in the Desert Foundation Inc DBA High Desert Community Foundation Inc — $3,200,822 over 6y, 68% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $2,964,428 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $2,026,916 over 5y, 21% of budgetCHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE SERVICES — $1,720,198 over 5y, 31% of budgetHEALTHIER KIDS FOUNDATION — $1,242,611 over 5y, 6.1% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO — $1,077,434 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetSan Diegans for Health Care Coverage — $959,143 over 6y, 44% of budgetYOLO COUNTY CHILDRENS ALLIANCE — $507,072 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH CONSORTIUM — $495,600 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetALIADOS HEALTH — $483,967 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetGive For A Smile — $379,759 over 8y, 89% of budgetREDWOODS RURAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $280,065 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $233,893 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMERCY FOUNDATION BAKERSFIELD — $233,312 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC — $168,821 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetINLAND WELLNESS INFORMATION NETWORK — $80,981 over 1y, 36% of budgetEL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA — $70,353 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSOLANO COALITION FOR BETTER HEALTH — $70,255 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks — $66,540 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAMPLA HEALTH — $59,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHWAYS — $47,530 over 3y, 15% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $46,645 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFresno Healthy Communities Access Partners — $44,589 over 2y, 7.4% of budgetDIGNITY HEALTH — $41,011 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $27,628 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE & REFERRAL CENTER OF SAN JOAQUIN — $25,924 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLUMAS CRISIS INTERVENTION AND RESOURCE CENTER — $24,653 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUnited Way of Santa Cruz County — $22,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBUILD REHABILITATION INDUSTRIES INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Endowm…Sunlight GivingEast Bay Community Fo…Sierra Health Foundat…Direct ReliefPublic Health Institu…The California Wellne…Sierra Health Foundat…California Physicians…California Community …California Healthcare…
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA37× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Endowment · Sunlight Giving · East Bay Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Direct Relief · Public Health Institute · The California Wellness Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Community Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Coverage & Health Initiatives funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home