Skip to content
California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems

Membership organization providing services to member hospitals including education and representation before legislative and regulatory bodies.

$1.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.2M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$8.0MPublic Benefit$595kEducation$330kCivil Rights$255kEmployment$207kCommunity Improvement$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kSocial Science$20k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k11 grants · $250k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.2M
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$125M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES$1,200,000
PROTECT OUR HEALTHCARE$75,000
THE LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION$50,000
WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP$35,000
CALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM$30,000
CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP$30,000
HEALTHIMPACT$25,000
CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$25,000
INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$20,000
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE$20,000
CALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$15,000
CALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION$15,000
SHAEF$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROTECT OUR HEALTHCARE: $75k → 8%HEALTHIMPACT: $50k → 10%INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $25k → 11%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.2M → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20k → 14%AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $30k → 14%HEALTH IMPACT: $30k → 10%INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $25k → 11%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.2M → 12%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20k → 14%HEALTH IMPACT: $27k → 10%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.2M → 12%HEALTHIMPACT: $25k → 10%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.2M → 12%HEALTHIMPACT: $25k → 10%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.0M → 12%HEALTHIMPACT: $25k → 10%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.0M → 12%HEALTHIMPACT: $25k → 10%CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS COMMITTEE ON ISSUES: $1.0M → 12%THE 2023 GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND: $100k → 12%THE LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%CALIFORNIA REPUBLICAN PARTY: $50k → 12%CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION & TRUST: $40k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $35k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $35k → 12%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM: $30k → 12%CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $30k → 12%THE LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA PUBLIC PROTECTION & PHYSICIAN HEALTH INC: $25k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S FUTURE: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25k → 12%CALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.0M · 14 repeat orgs$380k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$9.0M
$295k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic BenefitCivil RightsEducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    California Hospitals Committee on Issues
    7× · 2018–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +289% · 100% of their budget
  • H
    HealthImpact
    7× · 2017–2024 · $207k · revenue +62%
  • WI
    Women in California Leadership Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $190k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • 2G
    2023 Governors Inaugural Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • CR
    California Republican Party
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST
    one grant, 2018 · $40k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Californians to Protect Community Healthcare

To protect business transactions between health care facilities and provider groups with private investors from excessive government overreach in California through public education and advocacy

—
2
California Hotel & Lodging Association Hospitality Foundation
Education
3
Californians for Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability

To support policies and ballot measures to curb increases in taxes throughout the state of California, including the qualification and passage of a proposed statewide initiative relating to the imposition of taxes and fees (California…

—
4
California Chronic Care Coalition

To improve the health care system where all Californians can access appropriate, affordable, quality health care through education and collaboration with all branches of government and key stakeholders to re-design a system of care

Human Services
5
California Taxpayers Association

CalTaxs mission is to serve the general public and our members including Fortune 500 companies, small businesses and individuals by promoting sound tax policy and government efficiency at the state and local levels of government through…

—
6
Stop Sb 525

To protect patient access to affordable healthcare in California.

—
7
California Chamber of Commerce

Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…

—
8
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
9
Californians to Stop Higher Property Taxes

To educate the public and policy makers about the history and purpose of California's property tax law.

—
10
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
11
Consumer Federation of California

Cfc advocates for the rights of california consumers on a broad range of consumer issues.

Public Benefit
12
County Health Executives Assn of Ca

CHEAC promotes, protects, and works to improve the health of California's population. CHEAC's objective is to maximize local health departments' financial, organizational, and programmatic capacity to deliver local health services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Health Foundation and Trust; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

California Hospitals Committee on Issues: $7,800,000 · OtherCalifornia Hospitals Committee on Issues+11 more: $314,600 · OtherWomen in California Leadership Inc: $190,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $140,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationCalifornia Policy Group: $150,000 · Public BenefitCALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM: $135,000 · Public BenefitProtect Our Healthcare: $75,000 · Public BenefitHealthImpact: $206,500 · HealthCALIFORNIA PUBLIC PROTECTION AND PHYSICIAN HEALTH INC: $34,175 · HealthCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $30,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · HealthTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $110,000 · Civil RightsINDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $60,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $100,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$8,114,600Education$360,000Public Benefit$360,000Health$280,675Civil Rights$200,000Community Improvement$100,000Arts & Culture$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCalifornia Hospitals Committee on Issues: $7,800,000 over 7y, 100% of budgetHealthImpact: $206,500 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetWomen in California Leadership Inc: $190,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetCalifornia Policy Group: $150,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $140,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA ISSUES FORUM: $135,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $110,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASIAN PACIFIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $100,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budget2023 Governors Inaugural Fund: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetProtect Our Healthcare: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetINDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $60,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PUBLIC PROTECTION AND PHYSICIAN HEALTH INC: $34,175 over 2y, 27% of budgetCALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetAmerican Hospital Association: $29,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Problem Solvers Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSD ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…California Chamber of…California Charter Sc…Kaiser Foundation Hea…California Apartment …California Fire Found…The Personal Care Pro…Ca Broadband & Video …Sutter HealthUnited Domestic Worke…Donor Advised Charita…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · California Chamber of Commerce · California Charter Schools Association · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · California Apartment Association · California Fire Foundation · The Personal Care Products Council Inc · Ca Broadband & Video Association · Sutter Health · United Domestic Workers of America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home