Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

California Chamber of Commerce

Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists.

$156k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Public Benefit$427kCivil Rights$90kEducation$75kScience & Tech$55kArts & Culture$15kHealth$5k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP$30,000
CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP$30,000
CALIFORNIA PROBLEM SOLVERS ACTION FUND$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECH & INNOVATION ECONOMY$20,000
CA LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION$15,000
GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION$15,000
INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT$10,500
THE CALIFORNIA MUSEUM$5,000
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE LGBTQ FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $20k → 11%2023 GOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND: $175k → 12%CA LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT: $10k → 11%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%ALS ASSOCIATION - GOLDEN WEST CHARITY: $5k → 14%GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%CALIFORNIA POLICY GROUP: $30k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECH & INNOVATION ECONOMY: $20k → 14%GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%CA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $20k → 14%GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION: $12k → 16%WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA LEADERSHIP: $30k → 12%CA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%GOVERNOR'S CUP FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%CALIFORNIA PROBLEM SOLVERS ACTION FUND: $25k → 12%CA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $15k → 14%WOMEN IN CA LEADERSHIP: $15k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR CA TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION: $15k → 14%CA LEGISLATIVE LGBT FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%CA LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%CA LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE CALIFORNIA MUSEUM: $5k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR CA TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION: $10k → 14%CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE LGBTQ FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%FOUNDATION FOR CA TECHNOLOGY: $10k → 14%GOVERNOR'S INAUGURAL FUND 2019: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$397k · 8 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$397k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
Public BenefitArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHealthScience & TechOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    Women in California Leadership Inc
    2× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +75%
  • TC
    THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +45%
  • IV
    INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT
    4× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • 2G
    2023 Governors Inaugural Fund
    one grant, 2023 · $175k
  • GI
    GOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 2019
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -100%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA POLITICS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue -87%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Californians for Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability

To support policies and ballot measures to curb increases in taxes throughout the state of California, including the qualification and passage of a proposed statewide initiative relating to the imposition of taxes and fees (California…

2
Californians for Energy and Science

To provide californians with accurate, science-based information about energy and climate issues, enabling informed decision-making for our state's energy future. we believe that through education and transparent research, we can help…

Education
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
California Council on Science and Techno logy

The primary purpose of the organization is to examine and report on public policy issues related to Science and Technology that affect the State of California. CCST is a non-partisan, nonprofit organization that was established as an…

Science & Tech
5
Govern for California

The specific and primary purpose of Govern for California is to promote social welfare by improving the democratic process and the performance of government through policy reforms in election rules through education of candidates and…

Civil Rights
6
Consumer Federation of California

Cfc advocates for the rights of california consumers on a broad range of consumer issues.

Public Benefit
7
California Taxpayers Association

CalTaxs mission is to serve the general public and our members including Fortune 500 companies, small businesses and individuals by promoting sound tax policy and government efficiency at the state and local levels of government through…

8
The California Business Roundtable

The california business roundtable is a non-profit, nonpartisan organization composed of chief executive officers of leading california businesses. since 1976, the roundtable has provided essential leadership on high-priority public policy…

9
Californians for Fair Pay and Employer Accountability

To support policies and ballot measures to support employment reform.

10
Open California

Open Californias Mission is to inform, enlighten and educate Californians about public policy and state governance, and to provide a platform for engagement with public officials, advocates and political interests.

Education
11
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
12
California Forward Action Fund

The california forward action fund strives to improve the quality of life for all californians by advocating for policies that create inclusive, sustainable growth and improved government at the state and local levels. the action fund is…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Foundation for Commerce & Education and the most unlike its peers is Republican Main Street Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

2023 Governors Inaugural Fund — $175,000 · Other2023 Governors Inaugural FundCalifornia Problem Solvers Action Fund — $25,000 · OtherCalifornia Problem Solvers Action Fu…Institute for Democracy and Justice — $10,000 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherCalifornia Policy Group — $75,000 · Public BenefitCalifornia Policy GroupGOVERNORS CUP FOUNDATION INC — $62,000 · Public BenefitGOVERNORS CUP FOUNDATION IN…GOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 2019 — $25,000 · Public BenefitGOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 20…THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE — $50,000 · Civil RightsTHE CALIFORNIA …INDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT — $40,250 · Civil RightsINDEPENDENT VOT…Women in California Leadership Inc — $60,000 · EducationWomen in Cali…CALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA LG…FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY — $55,000 · Science & TechFOUNDATIO…LATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWOMEN IN CALIFORNIA POLITICS — $15,000 · Community ImprovementALS Network — $5,175 · Health
Other$215,000Public Benefit$162,000Civil Rights$90,250Education$80,000Science & Tech$55,000Arts & Culture$45,000Community Improvement$15,000Health$5,175

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget2023 Governors Inaugural Fund — $175,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetCalifornia Policy Group — $75,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetGOVERNORS CUP FOUNDATION INC — $62,000 over 5y, 8.7% of budgetWomen in California Leadership Inc — $60,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA'S TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION ECONOMY — $55,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE — $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetINDEPENDENT VOTER PROJECT — $40,250 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCalifornia Problem Solvers Action Fund — $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetGOVERNORS INAUGURAL FUND 2019 — $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetWOMEN IN CALIFORNIA POLITICS — $15,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetALS Network — $5,175 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA MUSEUM FOR HISTORY WOMEN AND THE ARTS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC21.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · California Association of Hospitals and Health Systems · California Fire Foundation · Ca Broadband & Video Association · California Charter Schools Association Advocates · California Apartment Association · United Domestic Workers of America · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · California Charter Schools Association · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Chamber of Commerce funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to California Chamber of Commerce?

    Find your warmest path to California Chamber of Commerce through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph