Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Caleres Cares Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2021
117
Grants FY2021
16
States reached
$480k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

86% of Caleres Cares Charitable Trust’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 45 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Caleres Cares Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 80 organizations, $2M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

60
20
80
21
45
22
0
23
0
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

International$1.2MPhilanthropy$1.1MEducation$733kEmployment$283kYouth Development$265kHealth$198kReligion$98kArts & Culture$90kOther$0
02FY2021 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k95 grants · $149k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $337k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $263k
  • $250k+2 grants · $754k
$1,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$212k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC$480,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$274,100
TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC$162,500
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC$100,000
CONCORDANCE ACADEMY OF LEADERSHIP$42,500
PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY$40,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER$40,000
SAINT LOUIS FASHION FUND$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$25,000
THE BLACK REP$25,000
NEW SCHOOLPARSONS SCHOOL DESIGN$17,500
ST CHARLES CHRISTIAN CHURCH$15,000
SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION$13,500
GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION$12,000
ST LOUIS EARTH DAY$10,956
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMP KESEM: $100 → 14%THE RESTORE NETWORK: $968 → 12%SOLES4SOULS: $3k → 14%SOLES4SOULS: $316 → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $30k → 14%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $3k → 21%GUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOC: $2k → 21%RUNG FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 21%ST LOUIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $393 → 11%A SEAT AT THE TABLE: $525 → 21%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS: $1k → 21%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $1k → 11%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $200 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 61 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

61 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2022, 33 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
87

Total granted

$2.6M
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+15%

Still filing today

62%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $552k · revenue +16%
  • TT
    TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $283k · revenue +4%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $55k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • C
    CONCORDANCE
    one grant, 2021 · $43k · revenue +10%
  • SL
    St Louis Black Repertory Company Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +123%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
4
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
5
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

6
Thomas Jefferson School

Thomas jefferson school engages its students in the education necessary to live as responsible citizens of the world. through the strongest possible college-prepatory program and within a nurturing community, students develop a…

7
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
8
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
11
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Paws On the Ground Colorado. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Senior Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …Animal Rescue and ShelterPublic Library OperationsLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Addiction Recovery ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDance Arts OrganizationsMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%52%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/135
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,430

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/113
Grantees still filing
81/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $1,218,528 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICAUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $1,060,661 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC+7 more — $38,300 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC — $200,000 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN…PACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY — $60,000 · OtherPACIFIC PEDIATRIC NEUR…ST CHARLES CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $48,150 · OtherST CHARLES CHRISTIAN C…CONCORDANCE — $42,500 · OtherFOOD ON FOOT — $30,403 · Other+119 more — $437,364 · Other+119 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $551,500 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVE…Saint Louis Fashion Fund — $25,000 · Education+17 more — $26,931 · EducationTWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC — $282,500 · Community Improvement+2 more — $2,250 · Community ImprovementAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,400 · HealthMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $9,750 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $6,106 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $4,400 · Health+7 more — $4,925 · HealthJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $55,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $5,000 · International+2 more — $800 · InternationalSt Louis Black Repertory Company Inc — $25,000 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL BLUES MUSEUM — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art — $5,000 · Arts & CultureGATEWAY CREATIVE BROADCASTING INC — $3,100 · Arts & CultureST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $2,810 · Arts & CulturePACK DANCE — $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+7 more — $3,478 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$2,317,489Other$818,417Education$603,431Community Improvement$284,750Health$75,581International$60,800Arts & Culture$54,388

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $1,218,528 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $1,060,661 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $551,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC — $282,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $55,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $50,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDANCE — $42,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD ON FOOT — $30,403 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSt Louis Black Repertory Company Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSaint Louis Fashion Fund — $25,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetThe United Way of Lee County Inc — $19,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS — $16,850 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION — $15,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION — $15,368 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Louis Earth Day — $11,456 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetVARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS — $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMIKEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS — $9,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $7,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $6,106 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSROADS SCHOOL DBA CROSSROADS COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $5,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGUARDIAN ANGEL SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION — $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL BLUES MUSEUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYourwords STL — $5,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetTHE WYMAN CENTER — $4,853 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $4,400 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMINADE UNIVERSITY OF HONOLULU — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS IN THE KNOW — $3,532 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetArms of Love International — $3,345 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY CREATIVE BROADCASTING INC — $3,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROMAN CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF EASTERN MISSOURI — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLES4SOULS INC — $2,816 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $2,810 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACK DANCE — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAGIC HOUSE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUNG FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEXT STEP — $2,250 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TWO TEN FOOTWEAR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CONCORDANCE
  • Who funds FOOD ON FOOT
  • Who funds St Louis Black Repertory Company Inc
  • Who funds Saint Louis Fashion Fund
  • Who funds The United Way of Lee County Inc
  • Who funds HOPE IGNITES ST LOUIS
  • Who funds GATEWAY ARCH PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SAINT LOUIS ZOO ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds St Louis Earth Day
  • Who funds VARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS
  • Who funds MIKEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEMORY CARE HOME SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO66.2× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Centene Foundation · Trio Foundation of St Louis · Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commission · Ameren Charitable Trust (Union Electric

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Caleres Cares Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The United Way of Lee County Inc1% of income from government
  • Goucher College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Caleres Cares Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Caleres Cares Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $866k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph