Skip to content
C Haley Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

C Haley Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$6kHealth$4kReligion$3kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$2kInternational$900Community Improvement$250Arts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORIZONS RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER$25,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HORIZONS RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER: $25k → 16%SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1k → 15%SENIOR SERVICES INC: $250 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $800 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $400 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $400 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $300 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 10 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +81% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$21k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
0%

Still filing today

40%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementReligionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +121%
  • CC
    CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +25%
  • SENIOR SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $700 · revenue +83%
  • RM
    RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRES CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $400
  • RM
    RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $300
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatuge Regional Hospital Inc

To provide high quality, cost effective health care and to promote wellness throughout our community.

Health
2
Wakemed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
3
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
4
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
5
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
7
Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
8
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
9
Home Health and Hospice Care Inc

See schedule oa community-based nonprofit agency rooted in the heart of north carolina, 3hc sets the standard for treating home health, hospice, and home care patients with quality, innovative, comprehensive and respectful care during…

Health
10
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
11
Thompson Cancer Survival Center

Thompson Cancer Survival Center provides support services for cancer patients, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to…

—
12
Trinity At Home Inc

Empowered by christ, we walk together with all we serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Horizons Residential Care Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORIZONS RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER INCCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $1,900 · Human ServicesCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INCSENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,250 · Human ServicesFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $7,700 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $2,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKNOVANT HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY: $1,700 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGuilford Co Public Schools: $1,150 · OtherGuilford Co Public SchoolsHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $1,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat…CROSSNORE CHILDRENS HOME: $900 · Other+4 more: $1,000 · Other+4 moreCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY: $200 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $900 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $700 · EducationJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WINSTON-SALEM INC: $250 · Community ImprovementTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM: $200 · Arts & CultureThe Winston-Salem Foundation: $100 · Philanthropy
Human Services$28,150Other$17,450Health$1,800Religion$900Education$700Community Improvement$250Arts & Culture$200Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHORIZONS RESIDENTIAL CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $1,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Winston-Salem Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reynolds American Fou…The Cannon Foundation…Foundation for the Ca…Krupa Family Foundati…Forsyth Memorial Hosp…Mariam & Robert Hayes…The Winston-Salem Fou…Baird Foundation IncRenaissance Charitabl…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…
Reynolds American FoundationNC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reynolds American Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Krupa Family Foundation Inc · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization C Haley Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from C Haley Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on C Haley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home