Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

C Haley Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$6kHealth$4kReligion$3kFood & Nutrition$2kEducation$2kInternational$900Community Improvement$250Arts & Culture$200Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$49k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,000
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SENIOR SERVICES INC: $1k → 15%SENIOR SERVICES INC: $250 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $800 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $400 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $400 → 15%CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC: $300 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16k · 10 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +106% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$16k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+106%
0%

Still filing today

40%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +121%
  • CC
    CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +36%
  • SENIOR SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $1k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $700 · revenue +83%
  • RM
    RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRES CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $400
  • RM
    RUMPLE MEMORIAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $300

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
4
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
5
Chatuge Regional Hospital Inc

To provide high quality, cost effective health care and to promote wellness throughout our community.

Health
6
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

7
Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
8
Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

9
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

10
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
11
West Georgia Medical Center Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
12
Wellstar Sylvan Grove Hospital

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Control Ministry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $2,700 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHNOVANT HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION — $2,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $2,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKSALVATION ARMY — $1,700 · OtherSALVATION ARMYGuilford Co Public Schools — $1,150 · OtherGuilford Co Public SchoolsCROSSNORE CHILDRENS HOME — $900 · OtherCROSSNORE CHILDRENS HOMERUMPLE MEMORIAL PRES CHURCH — $400 · Other+3 more — $600 · OtherCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC — $1,900 · Human ServicesCRISIS CONTROL MINI…SENIOR SERVICES INC — $1,250 · Human ServicesSENIOR SERVICES INCCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 · HealthCROSSNORE …COMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY — $200 · HealthCOMMUNITY …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 · HealthBLOOD CANC…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $900 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $700 · EducationJUNIOR LEAGUE OF WINSTON-SALEM INC — $250 · Community ImprovementTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM — $200 · Arts & CultureThe Winston-Salem Foundation — $100 · Philanthropy
Other$11,450Human Services$3,150Health$1,800Religion$900Education$700Community Improvement$250Arts & Culture$200Philanthropy$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC — $1,900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES INC — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Winston-Salem Foundation — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF WINSTON-SALEM INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY
  • Who funds THE BLOWING ROCK ART & HISTORY MUSEUM
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds The Winston-Salem Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Reynolds American FoundationNC15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Reynolds American Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Krupa Family Foundation Inc · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Mariam & Robert Hayes Charitable Trust · The Winston-Salem Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization C Haley Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph