· Private foundation
Krupa Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $31,000 |
| YUVA UNSTOPPABLE USA | $25,000 |
| HUMAN SERVICES FOUNDATION | $16,850 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NW NC | $6,000 |
| WINSTON SALEM FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| CROSSNORE SCHOOL CHILDRENS HOME | $1,000 |
| WINSTON SALEM RESCUE MISSION | $1,000 |
| SHEPARDS CENTER | $1,000 |
| COMMUNITY CARE CENTER | $1,000 |
| CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| BETHESDA CENTER | $1,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $1,000 |
| SENIOR SERVICES | $1,000 |
| VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP | $151 |
| VALLABH PUSHTI SAMAJ OF CAROLINAS | $151 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 100% of Krupa Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VUVYO USA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $668k · revenue +426% · 31% of their budget
- MSMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC3× · 2020–2023 · $170k · revenue +45%
- VSVAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC5× · 2020–2024 · $97k · revenue +251% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- SFSANSKRUTI FOUNDATION USAone grant, 2020 · $15k
- TLTRUTH LOVE AND COMPANSSIONone grant, 2018 · $6k
DUKE UNIVERSITYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide help to underprivileaged children
The organization is primarily engaged in providing funding for services in the fields of treatment and rehabilitation of persons afected by polio.
To provide health care services in india
To promote universal peace and universal integration
Our mission is to provide quality, safe & comprehensive health care to those in need.
To provide necessary health care for uninsured individuals
Religious activities and enhancing hindu religious culture
Provide food relief to third world areas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Control Ministry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Vyo Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VYO USA INC ↗
- Who funds MUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC ↗
- Who funds VAISHNAV SAMAJ OF RTP INC ↗
- Who funds The Winston-Salem Foundation ↗
- Who funds Human Service Foundation ↗
- Who funds ACUMEN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Yuva Unstoppable USA Inc ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHWEST NC INC ↗
- Who funds SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE CENTER FOR FORSYTH COUNTY ↗
- Who funds THE WINSTON-SALEM RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CONTROL MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds Bethesda Center for the Homesless Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DIVYAJYOT FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reynolds American Foundation · Strickland Family Foundation Cynthia a S Graham · Ta John W and Anna H Hanes Foundation · C Haley Foundation Inc · Richard Wood Averill Charitable Trust aka Richard Wood Averill Foundation · Flow Foundation Inc · Shallow Ford Foundation Inc · Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc · Reynolds Foundation 186-8803582 · Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Krupa Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.