Skip to content

· Private foundation

Building Bridge Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$730k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.3MHealth$701kYouth Development$466kReligion$281kFood & Nutrition$240kRecreation & Sports$222kHuman Services$83kArts & Culture$79kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $152k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $558k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON COUNTY YOUNG LIFE$85,000
JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT$82,100
COMAL COUNTY YOUNG LIFE$75,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS$75,000
NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$75,000
BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH$60,000
EDNA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$55,500
NEW BRAUNFELS YOUTH COLLABORATIVE$50,000
FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT$40,000
EDNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$27,000
MCKENNA FOUNDATION$25,000
CITY OF EDNA PUBLIC SAFETY$25,000
THE VINE SCHOOL$25,000
ST JUDE RANCH FOR CHILDRENTEXAS$10,000
TEXAS A&M CORPUS CHRISTI$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST JUDE RANCH FOR CHILDRENTEXAS: $10k → 7%FRIENDS OF ELDER CITIZENS: $1k → 20%ANY WOMAN CAN LLC: $5k → 16%CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 27 repeat orgs$285k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
30

Total granted

$3.2M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+44%

Still filing today

48%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $386k · revenue +8%
  • NB
    NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES
    4× · 2021–2024 · $230k · revenue +2%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $192k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +144%
  • JC
    JACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $49k
  • CI
    CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
2
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
3
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
4
East Texas Community Clinic Inc

To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.

—
5
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
6
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
7
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
8
Coastal Bend Food Bank

To collect and warehouse food which has been donated by concerned businesses and organizations and distribute it to social agencies which feed the needy

Food & Nutrition
9
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
10
Childrens Advocacy Center of Hidalgo County Inc

The childrens advocacy center of hidalgo county, inc. provides services to abused children. services include on-site referrals for medical services. the organization follows up with authorities on efforts against the perpetrators of the…

Crime & Legal
11
Coastal Bend Community Foundation

To enhance the quality of life in the coastal bend area of texas through charitable and educational grants.

Philanthropy
12
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections Individual and Family Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Memory Gardens of Edna Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JACKSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT: $250,100 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURTJACKSON COUNTY YOUNG LIFE: $222,000 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY YOUNG LIFEEDNA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $159,598 · OtherEDNA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTCOMAL COUNTY YOUNG LIFE: $150,000 · OtherCOMAL COUNTY YOUNG LIFETEXANA ARTS COUNCIL: $73,750 · OtherTEXANA ARTS COUNCILCITY OF EDNA PUBLIC SAFETY: $56,000 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT: $48,840 · Other+40 more: $329,345 · Other+40 moreEDNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $577,000 · EducationEDNA EDUCATION FOUNDATIONTHE VINE SCHOOL: $219,651 · EducationTHE VINE SCHOOL+3 more: $26,000 · EducationNEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $230,000 · HealthNEW BRAUNFELS…MCKENNA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthMCKENNA FOUND…BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH: $75,000 · HealthBILLY T CATTA…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $385,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES …YOUNG LIFE: $191,650 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIF…New Braunfels Youth Collaborative: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentNew Braun…+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $228,560 · Food & NutritionSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 · Animals
Other$1,289,633Education$822,651Health$430,000Community Improvement$385,500Youth Development$294,150Food & Nutrition$228,560Animals$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEDNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $577,000 over 4y, 44% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $385,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetNEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES: $230,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT: $228,560 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE VINE SCHOOL: $219,651 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $191,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMCKENNA FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNew Braunfels Youth Collaborative: $100,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetBILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH: $75,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTEXANA ARTS COUNCIL: $73,750 over 2y, 19% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPWARD HOPE ACADEMY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCOMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS: $12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANY WOMAN CAN NP: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMemory Gardens of Edna Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRU PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFLORIDA COLLEGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARY HARDIN-BAYLOR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELDER CITIZENS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EDNA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF VICTORIA DBA FOOD BANK OF THE GOLDEN CRESCENT ↗
  • Who funds THE VINE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MCKENNA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Braunfels Youth Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds BILLY T CATTAN RECOVERY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds TEXANA ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UPWARD HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Palacios Community Coalition ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BOTANICAL GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANY WOMAN CAN NP ↗
  • Who funds Memory Gardens of Edna Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harvey E Najim Charitable FoundationTX19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · United Way of Comal County · McKenna Foundation · New Braunfels Area Community Foundation · Velma Lee & John Harvey Robinson Charitable Founda · The Gvtc Foundation Inc · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Veramendi Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Building Bridge Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Building Bridge Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Florida College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Building Bridge’s filings →

More from the funding graph