Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Brunelli Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Animals$25kReligion$24kEnvironment$22kHealth$14kHuman Services$14kInternational$11kArts & Culture$3kYouth Development$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$237k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
DALLAS ARBORETUM$4,500
SPCA OF TEXAS$3,000
EISEMANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$2,989
NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$2,000
SOUP MOBILE$2,000
RICHARDSON ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
WORLD VISION$1,768
SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL$1,000
TAKE ME HOME PET RESCUE$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $3k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 14%SOUP MOBILE: $2k → 14%SOUP MOBILE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$72k · 7 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$72k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+14%

Still filing today

86%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DA
    DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +51%
  • SO
    SPCA of Texas
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +1%
  • NO
    NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • WT
    WTF-WINNING THE FIGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • DS
    DALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • TG
    THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rockwall Adoption Center

To work with our community to strengthen the bond between animals and people, enhancing the quality of their lives through compassionate sheltering, responsible adoptions, education, and community outreach.

Animals
2
Divine Canines

Divine canines therapy encourages smiles and brightens lives. to accomplish this, we recruit and train teams of dogs and their owners and organize and facilitate regular, frequent visits to residents of special care facilities.

Animals
3
Dallas Pets Alive

Our mission is to promote and provide the resources, education and programs needed to eliminate the killing of companion animals.

Animals
4
Central Texas Spca

Rescue neglected, unwanted homeless dogs and cats nurture and provide shelter until they are placed with a forever family strive to reduce animal overpopulation prevent cruelty to animals teach responsible pet ownership through an outreach…

Animals
5
Dfw Rescue Me Inc

Rescue dogs that have been abused, not cared for by owner or turned into the local animal control shelter

Animals
6
Operation Kindness

Our mission is to create a kinder world for pets and the people who love them by providing lifesaving care, innovative programs, and community resources.

Animals
7
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
8
Dfw Humane Society of Irving Inc

Provide food, shelter and care for homeless, unwanted, pets. give pets a second chance by adoption. pay medical bills incoming injured animals, assist pet owners with free spay/neuter and medical appointments at veterinarians. educate thr…

Animals
9
Dallas Area Rape Crisis Center

To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.

Human Services
10
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
11
Goodwill Industries of Dallas Inc

Goodwill Industries of Dallas, Inc. is a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help people with barriers to employment build skills, find jobs and reach their goals in life so that they can reach their full potential and experience…

Employment
12
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spca of Texas and the most unlike its peers is Wtf-Winning the Fight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $15,000 · OtherTRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHOAK CLIFF BIBLE FELLOWSHIP — $6,000 · OtherOAK CLIFF BIBLE FELLOWSHIPEISEMANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS — $2,989 · OtherEISEMANN CENTER FOR PERFORMING…RICHARDSON ANIMAL SHELTER — $2,000 · OtherRICHARDSON ANIMAL SHELTER+6 more — $4,250 · Other+6 moreSPCA of Texas — $12,500 · AnimalsSPCA of TexasTake Me Home Pet Rescue Inc — $8,000 · AnimalsTake Me Home Pet Rescu…DALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES — $1,000 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION — $1,000 · AnimalsDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $21,500 · EnvironmentDALLAS ARBORETUM AND …NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF CO…SOUPMOBILE INC — $3,500 · Human ServicesSOUPMOBILE IN…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,500 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTI…WTF-WINNING THE FIGHT — $2,000 · HealthWTF-WINNING …+1 more — $300 · HealthWORLD VISION INC — $10,635 · InternationalWORLD VISIO…+1 more — $240 · InternationalSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC — $300 · Recreation & Sports
Other$30,239Animals$22,500Environment$21,500Human Services$13,500Health$12,800International$10,875Recreation & Sports$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC — $21,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas — $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $10,635 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN — $10,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTake Me Home Pet Rescue Inc — $8,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSOUPMOBILE INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS STREET DOG ADVOCATES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNexus Recovery Center Incorporated — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN DIABETIC FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX18.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · McKesson Foundation Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Dallas Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Brunelli Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph