Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$6.6MCommunity Improvement$5.0MHealth$3.9MPhilanthropy$3.0MInternational$1.1MYouth Development$305kRecreation & Sports$181kArts & Culture$160kHuman Services$70kOther$6.6M
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $52k
  • $250k+3 grants · $7.2M
$500,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$5,000,000
LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY$1,687,786
PARKER INSTITUTE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY$500,000
ISRAEL WATER POLO ASSOCIATION$35,000
THE MILKEN INSTITUTE$16,961
COLLIER SERVICES FOUNDATION INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%OAKLAND LACROSSE CLUB: $10k → 10%THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%Oakland Lacrosse Club: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 20% of Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 12 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
31

Total granted

$17M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+18%

Still filing today

83%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3.0M · revenue +18%
  • CM
    CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3.0M · revenue +409%
  • CP
    CALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $625k · revenue +195%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M · revenue +18%
  • TT
    The Tenacity Projec Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $310k
  • GS
    GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $250k · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
3
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collier Services Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Israel Lacrosse Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support OrganizationsChild and Family ServicesCommunity Arts OrganizationsElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development CentersVeteran Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Community Health CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Independent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%32%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr11%13%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%25%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%10%35–55yr13%47%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/45
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,933

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
30/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $5,250,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SA…CALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $625,000 · EducationCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLSTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $400,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY …+7 more — $371,000 · Education+7 moreSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTON — $2,600,000 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLS ATHERTONTrustees of Princeton University — $1,700,000 · OtherTrustees of Princeton Univers…LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY — $1,687,786 · OtherLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNO…The Tenacity Projec Inc — $310,000 · Other+20 more — $732,461 · Other+20 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 · Community ImprovementBROWN UNIVERSITY+1 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $3,000,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTI…PARKER INSTITUTE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY — $500,000 · HealthPARKER INSTITUTE…GRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthGRACE SCIENCE FO…+3 more — $115,000 · HealthTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $3,000,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POIN…+1 more — $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $1,000,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $100,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $50,000 · InternationalLIAHONA MOTU FOUNDATION — $275,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $5,000 · Youth Development
Education$6,646,000Other$7,030,247Community Improvement$5,050,000Health$3,865,000Philanthropy$3,050,000International$1,150,000Youth Development$305,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $5,250,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $5,000,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $3,000,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $3,000,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetLA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY — $1,687,786 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $625,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPARKER INSTITUTE FOR CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY — $500,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $400,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIAHONA MOTU FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetGRACE SCIENCE FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPENINSULA ARTS GUILD — $150,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $105,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWPLL Foundation Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetISRAEL LACROSSE ASSOCIATION INC — $79,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetSILICON VALLEY SOCIAL VENTURE FUND - SV2 — $50,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetEAST PALO ALTO ACADEMY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFEDERATION OF INTERNATIONAL LACROSSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetIMAGINE WORLDWIDE — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHIRD OPTION FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S BOOK BANK — $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUS LACROSSE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetOakland Lacrosse Club — $20,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $16,961 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART AND HAND CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSamaritan Homeless Interim Program Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCAL BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetHILLBARN THEATRE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLIER SERVICES FOUNDATION INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SUNSHINE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLIER SERVICES - SISTERS OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Marin Community Found…The David and Lucile …The Goldman Sachs Cha…Greene Van Arsdale Fo…Staley Family Foundat…Robert and Dana Emery…The San Francisco Fou…Gordon E and Betty I …National Philanthropi…Impactassetsinc
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA26× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Marin Community Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Greene Van Arsdale Foundation co KKR Accounting Services LLC · Staley Family Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company · The San Francisco Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Collier Services - Sisters of the Good Shepherd — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inc?

Find your warmest path to Briger Foundation for Oncology Research Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines