· Private foundation
Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $523k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $150,000 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS ISRAEL | $40,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF NEW YORK CITY | $35,000 |
| THE MET COUNCIL | $35,000 |
| CITY HARVEST | $35,000 |
| PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $25,000 |
| JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY | $25,000 |
| CONGREGATION BAITH ISRAEL ANSHEI EMES | $25,000 |
| SHELTER FOR HELP IN EMERGENCY | $20,000 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVAS ISRAEL | $20,000 |
| BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK | $20,000 |
| PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND OF CHARLOTTESVILLE-ALBEMARLE | $20,000 |
| HANNAH SENESH COMMUNITY DAY SCHOOL | $18,000 |
| SERENITY FARM EQUINE SANCTUARY INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $325k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 57 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $369k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC4× · 2017–2022 · $255k · revenue +199%
CITY HARVEST INC7× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +75%
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY6× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- WFWOLFENSOHN FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $210k · revenue -34%
- CUCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTone grant, 2019 · $50k
- CUCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SEASone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…
The new york studio school is committed to giving a significant education to the aspiring artist, a preamble to a lifetime's engagement in drawing, painting, and sculpture. (see schedule o for continuation)
For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International House and the most unlike its peers is The Rolling Dog Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
120 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 120 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF GREATER CONEY ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds WOLFENSOHN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds LIVE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds BANG ON A CAN ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds SERVICE DOGS OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds ACERA SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL FOUNDATION OF CAMBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PARAMOUNT THEATER FOUNDATION IN F/K/A THE PARAMOUNT THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BILDERBERG INC ↗
- Who funds Cultivate Charlottesville ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wolfensohn Family Foundation · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Caplin Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · Perry Foundation Inc · The Oak Hill Fund · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · Sentara Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Food Link Inc — 9% of income from government
- Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Florida Oceanographic Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Botwinick-Wolfensohn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.