How much does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua give?

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua reported 32 grants totaling $408,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 25 and 27 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.

What does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua fund?

By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (30%), Philanthropy (20%), Arts & Culture (18%).

Who are Borun Harry H and Anna Tua's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Los Angeles Youth Orchestra ($625k), Descanso Gardens Foundation ($600k), Earthwatch Institute Inc ($153k).

Does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 12% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as Borun Harry H and Anna Tua?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, California Community Foundation, The Ahmanson Foundation.

Where is Borun Harry H and Anna Tua based?

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua is based in MO.

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua at a glance

· Private foundation

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$408k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$150k

Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Borun Harry H and Anna Tua’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Council Of Greater La, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 23 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Borun Harry H and Anna Tua named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $408k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

’18

’19

’20

’21

’22

’23

’24

’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$1.0MPhilanthropy$698kArts & Culture$625kEducation$488kInternational$241kFood & Nutrition$160kHuman Services$60kHealth$59kOther$0

02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k26 grants · $50k
$10k–50k3 grants · $79k
$50k–250k3 grants · $280k

$2,000

Median grant

States reached

$7.2M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE JEWIS	$150,000
LOS ANGELES YOUTH ORCHESTRA	$75,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION	$55,000
NORTH AMERICAN FRIENDS OF GREAT DIXTER	$40,000
EARTHWATCH INSTITUTE INC	$25,000
THE MONO LAKE FOUNDATION	$13,500
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY	$5,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC	$3,000
BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERIC	$3,000
STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER INC	$2,500
BL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC	$2,000
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATI	$2,000
LOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE	$2,000
MENDMEET EACH NEED WITH DIGNITY	$2,000
MERCY SHIPS	$2,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$2.1M · 36 repeat orgs$460k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 28 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%

+123%

Still filing today

75%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalEnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureScience & TechOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

LA
Los Angeles Youth Orchestra
6× · 2018–2025 · $625k · revenue +36% · 49% of their budget
DG
DESCANSO GARDENS FOUNDATION
3× · 2020–2023 · $600k · revenue +171%
TN
THE NORTH AMERICAN FRIENDS OF GREAT DIXTER LTD
2× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +33%

Funded once

SC
SO CAL HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
one grant, 2020 · $160k
TW
The Wildlands Conservancygraduated
one grant, 2018 · $77k · revenue +123%
TJ
THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INCgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +62%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—

Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education

The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education

Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—

The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement

Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy

Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—

Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Doheny Eye Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/35

Grantees still filing

26/35

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Environment$764,000Other$810,000Philanthropy$679,700Arts & Culture$627,000Education$308,000Science & Tech$169,500International$61,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Borun Harry H and Anna Tua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Borun Harry H and Anna Tua. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Borun Harry H and Anna Tua’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home