Skip to content

Missouri · Private foundation

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$408k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
32
Grants FY2024
26
Organizations funded FY2023
12%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

61% of Borun Harry H and Anna Tua’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Jewish Federation Council Of Greater La, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 23 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Borun Harry H and Anna Tua named its own grantees at scale: 25 organizations, $408k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

20
’18
20
’19
20
’20
20
’21
23
’22
23
’23
25
’24
23
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2024
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
25 to 27
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
7
Total assets, FY2024
$7.2M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 12% of the organizations Borun Harry H and Anna Tua funded were first-time grantees, receiving 14% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EnvironmentPhilanthropyEducationScience & TechInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving30$351k13%
FY202326$320k12%
FY202225$174k8%
FY202125$356k4%
FY202027$425k11%
FY201926$354k8%
FY201826$348kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$1.0MPhilanthropy$698kArts & Culture$625kEducation$488kInternational$241kFood & Nutrition$160kHuman Services$60kHealth$59kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
MD
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Los Angeles Youth Orchestra$625,000649%
Descanso Gardens Foundation$600,00033%
Earthwatch Institute Inc$153,00051%
The North American Friends of Great Dixter Ltd$80,000217%
The Wildlands Conservancy$77,00011%
The Mono Lake Foundation$74,70060%
Chabad of Brentwood Inc$28,0001n/a
American Friends of Magen David Adom$25,00080%
Venice Family Clinic$24,00080%
Bl Girls Town Jerusalem Inc$24,00080%
Show all 30 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($580k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Borun Harry H and Anna Tua supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 29 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLos Angeles Youth Orchestra: $625,000 over 6y, 49% of budgetDescanso Gardens Foundation: $600,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetEarthwatch Institute Inc: $153,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe North American Friends of Great Dixter Ltd: $80,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetThe Wildlands Conservancy: $77,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetThe Mono Lake Foundation: $74,700 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVenice Family Clinic: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBl Girls Town Jerusalem Inc: $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBoys Town Jerusalem Foundation of America: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJohns Hopkins University: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetStroud Water Research Center: $16,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBarlow Respiratory Hospital: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLos Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOrt America Inc: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEND - Meet Each Need With Dignity: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHamburger Home: $12,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Smile Inc: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDoheny Eye Institute: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Student Conservation Association Inc: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBet Tzedek: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetProject Orbis International Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFulfillment Fund: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEarthjustice: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Jewish Foundation for the Righteous Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 29.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Borun Harry H and Anna Tua with peer funders

About Borun Harry H and Anna Tua

How much does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua give?
Borun Harry H and Anna Tua reported 32 grants totaling $408,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 25 and 27 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (30%), Philanthropy (20%), Arts & Culture (18%).
Who are Borun Harry H and Anna Tua's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Los Angeles Youth Orchestra ($625k), Descanso Gardens Foundation ($600k), Earthwatch Institute Inc ($153k).
Does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 12% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Borun Harry H and Anna Tua accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Borun Harry H and Anna Tua?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles, California Community Foundation, The Ahmanson Foundation.
Where is Borun Harry H and Anna Tua based?
Borun Harry H and Anna Tua is based in MO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Borun Harry H and Anna Tua’s filings →

More from the funding graph