Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bjh Foundation for Senior Services Carolina Foundation for Jewish Seniors

TO PROMOTE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH JEWISH VALUES AND BELIEFS, QUALITY HEALTH CARE AND/OR AN ENRICHED JEWISH ENVIRONMENT FOR THE JEWISH SENIORS IN THE CAROLINA.

$469k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of BJH FOUNDATION FOR SENIOR SERVICES CAROLINA FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH SENIORS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $300k
$13,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLESTON$70,000
RALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FAMILY SVCS OF THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF RALEIGH-CARY$65,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC$60,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBORO$55,000
JEWISH FOR GOOD$50,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE$48,000
GREENVILLE JEWISH FEDERATION$31,500
COLUMBIA JEWISH FEDERATION$30,000
TEMPLE B'NAI SHOLEM$15,000
SANDRA AND LEON LEVINE JCC$13,000
B'NAI ISRAEL CONGREGATION$5,000
ASHEVILLE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
MEMORY MATTERS$5,000
CHARLESTON JEWISH FEDERATION$5,000
CONGREGATION BETH ISRAEL$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $934k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLESTON: $70k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $82k → 12%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLESTON: $70k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $76k → 12%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC: $3k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLESTON: $62k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $75k → 12%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC: $2k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $60k → 12%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC: $2k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $44k → 12%CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC: $2k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC: $44k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC: $40k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC: $38k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $49k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $48k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $41k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $35k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $30k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $23k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $15k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLOTTE: $15k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 35 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

35 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
6

Total granted

$2.0M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $459k · revenue +258%
  • JF
    Jewish Family Services of Greater Charlotte Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $256k · revenue +146%
  • SA
    Sandra and Leon Levine Jewish Community Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • BC
    BURINING COAL THEATRE COMPANY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SG
    STAN GREENSPON HOLOCAUST AND SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BI
    BETH ISRAEL CONGREGATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of Cumberland Gloucester & Salem Counties

Advancement of the Jewish Community

Philanthropy
2
Wnc Jewish Federation

The mission of the WNC Jewish Federation is to harness the collective resources of the WNC Jewish community and direct them to the Jewish needs in the local community, in Israel and abroad.

3
Jewish Federation of Greater Clifton-Passaic
4
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
5
Jewish Community Center of Southern Nevada Inc

To provide jewish educational, social, athletic and cultural programs to the community.

Unclassified
6
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
7
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
8
The Jewish Community Foundation Charitable Fund
9
Jewish Life Foundation
10
Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging , finanical uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

11
Carolina Jews for Justice Goldstein

Grassroots network of jewish residents for a just and compassionate north carolina.

Religion
12
Jewish Federation of Greater Buffalo Inc

Guided by Jewish values, the federation convenes, inspires, collaborates, leads and enriches the jewish community locally and around the world. The Federation also serves as a fundraising body and coordinates a veriety of services on the…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Services of Wnc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Creative Aging Network - Nc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%5%<5yr17%5%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr13%24%20–35yr11%38%35–55yr12%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr17%10%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr13%21%20–35yr11%32%35–55yr12%7%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
16%
4,383/26,977

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBORO — $170,524 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBOROSANDRA AND LEON LEVINE JCC — $160,740 · OtherSANDRA AND LEON LEVINE JCCDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION — $156,000 · OtherDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATIONJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION — $152,723 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREENSBORO JEWISH FED…TEMPLE BNAI SHOLEM INC — $71,240 · OtherTEMPLE BNAI SHOLEM INCRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $69,385 · OtherRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $66,000 · OtherRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES+31 more — $389,840 · Other+31 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC — $458,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INCJewish Family Services of Greater Charlotte Inc — $255,996 · Human ServicesJewish Family Services of Greater Ch…Jewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc — $202,000 · Human ServicesJewish Family Services of Greater Ch…+2 more — $22,500 · Human ServicesRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $403,000 · PhilanthropyRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FEDERA…Charleston Jewish Federation Inc — $144,000 · PhilanthropyCharleston Jewish Federati…GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION — $107,784 · PhilanthropyGREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATI…COLUMBIA JEWISH FEDERATION — $30,000 · PhilanthropySandra and Leon Levine Jewish Community Center Inc — $55,000 · Recreation & SportsJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC — $18,000 · ReligionNORTH CAROLINA FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE INC — $103 · Civil Rights
Other$1,236,452Human Services$938,996Philanthropy$684,784Recreation & Sports$55,000Religion$18,000Civil Rights$103

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC — $458,500 over 8y, 17% of budgetRALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $403,000 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetJewish Family Services of Greater Charlotte Inc — $255,996 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetJewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc — $202,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION — $156,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetCharleston Jewish Federation Inc — $144,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetGREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION — $107,784 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSandra and Leon Levine Jewish Community Center Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Federation of Upstate South Carolina — $31,500 over 1y, 36% of budgetCOLUMBIA JEWISH FEDERATION — $30,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC — $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC — $17,500 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetMEMORY MATTERS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Community Center Foundation of Asheville Inc — $4,200 over 1y, 18% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA FOR COMMUNITY AND JUSTICE INC — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WNC INC
  • Who funds RALEIGH-CARY JEWISH FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services of Greater Charlotte Inc
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc
  • Who funds DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds Charleston Jewish Federation Inc
  • Who funds GREENSBORO JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds Sandra and Leon Levine Jewish Community Center Inc
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Upstate South Carolina
  • Who funds COLUMBIA JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ASHEVILLE INC
  • Who funds CREATIVE AGING NETWORK - NC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Leon Levine FoundationNC31.9× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Leon Levine Foundation · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · The Jewish Federations of North America Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Jewish Foundation of Greensboro · Greensboro Jewish Federation · Well-Spring Retirement Community Inc · Foundation for the Charlotte Jewish Community · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bjh Foundation for Senior Services Carolina Foundation for Jewish Seniors funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph