Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Beverly Hills Rotary Community Foundation Rotary International

Community and youth services

$177k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$74kInternational$70kEducation$69kPhilanthropy$30kCivil Rights$18kHealth$18kFood & Nutrition$18kEnvironment$16kCrime & Legal$10kOther$111k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $14,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $176,680 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $162,680 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROTARY CLUB OF WARSAW$8,000
CASA OF LOS ANGELES$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $6k → 14%CHILDREN OF THE NIGHT: $10k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $10k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $10k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE LA: $6k → 14%THE COLLINS & KATZ FAMILY YMC: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$257k · 9 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +127% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
14

Total granted

$257k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+127%
+17%

Still filing today

89%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $71k · revenue +255%
  • RI
    ROTARY INTL DISTRICT 5280 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $55k · revenue +729%
  • CO
    CASA OF LOS ANGELES
    3× · 2018–2024 · $18k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • HI
    HIAS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $18k · revenue -6%
  • P
    PATH
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +3%
  • LA
    LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Works

Our mission is to create housing and service options that model, with respect and dignity, sustainable, environmentally sensitive, affordable communities for people of limited resources.

Housing & Shelter
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Interval House

The mission of the organization is to ensure safety and stability for people who are battered, abused, homeless or at risk; to create public awareness about the epidemic of violence; and to mobilize the community to prevent violence and…

Human Services
4
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
5
The Anti-Recidivism Coalition

The anti-recidivism coalition (arc) works to end mass incarceration in california. to ensure our communities are safe, healthy, and whole, arc empowers formerly and currently incarcerated people to thrive by providing a support network,…

Crime & Legal
6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
8
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Rescue Mission Alliance

The rescue mission alliance's primary purpose is to establish and operate rescue missions to reach the less fortunate with the gospel of jesus christ and to assist in the feeding, clothing, and lodging of those who are destitute or…

Human Services
11
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
12
Downtown Women's Center

Housing, employment, and physical and mental health services for women overcoming homelessness and poverty.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Formidable Joy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr10%55%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%22%20–35yr10%58%35–55yr12%9%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
16%
7,867/49,793

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
17/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER — $71,200 · OtherTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTERROTARY CLUB OF WARSAW — $16,500 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF WARSAWLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $15,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKDEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY — $8,400 · OtherDEPT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILYWESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $17,500 · OtherWESTSIDE FOOD BANKFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC — $15,600 · OtherFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INCCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $10,000 · OtherCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKI…Imagine Los Angeles Inc — $16,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles…Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $12,103 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christi…THE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSIO…Children of the Night — $10,000 · Human ServicesChildren of the Nig…ST JOSEPH CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH CENTERPATH — $10,000 · Human ServicesPATHJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $6,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVI…THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $18,500 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDAT…HIAS INC — $18,000 · InternationalHIAS INCPATH — $15,000 · InternationalPATHWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITC…HERO WOMEN RISING INC — $7,500 · InternationalHERO WOMEN RISING …ROTARY INTL DISTRICT 5280 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $54,800 · EducationROTARY INTL DISTRI…JEWISH WORLD WATCH — $7,000 · EducationJEWISH WORLD WATCHSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $7,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND I…FORMIDABLE JOY — $29,750 · PhilanthropyCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $18,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $17,500 · Health
Other$154,200Human Services$74,103International$69,500Education$68,800Philanthropy$29,750Civil Rights$18,000Health$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MAPLE COUNSELING CENTER — $71,200 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetROTARY INTL DISTRICT 5280 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $54,800 over 5y, 14% of budgetFORMIDABLE JOY — $29,750 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $18,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHIAS INC — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK — $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc — $16,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF ROBINSON GARDENS INC — $15,600 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPATH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $12,103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren of the Night — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERO WOMEN RISING INC — $7,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH — $7,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Jewish Community Foun…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
California Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Beverly Hills Rotary Community Foundation Rotary International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $167k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines